this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
226 points (71.0% liked)

People Twitter

5367 readers
2099 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Why would this be available from an api?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not an expert but this seems likely fake, it just feels real because they really do let those accounts say whatever

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

Definitely fake. I've worked in IT, and I know Okta's offerings. They do multi-factor and SSO stuff, basically password management stuff on steroids along with any regulatory compliance checklist stuff.

They do not rent out cloud infrastructure for other companies to use.

[–] Anticorp 17 points 4 months ago

Because... Reasons! Okay? Just believe, and be outraged.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Why not? This is one of the more tame things Musk screwed up.

But no, this is most likely fake. It's way too convenient for it to be true.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not how code works. There's no reason to send this information to the client because the filtering runs server side, so the client never needs to know about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're assuming proper design. I've worked on systems where filtering was done client-side (and fixed that), it's stupid, but it's what happens when a FE is assigned a task and uses the tools at their disposal. In fact, I think Lemmy used to filter deleted comments clientside a few versions ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

If they were deleting contents client-side then you could get around the filters by using something like tweet deck. Since we know that doesn't work we know that the filtering can't be done client-side.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Anecdotal but I’ve encountered a lot of this lately. It seems people have taken to dropping the term “API” arbitrarily into posts and conversations to signal knowledgeability with recognizable lingo, often resulting in nearly plausible but not quite accurate technical descriptions.

TBF I bet it works most of the time, due to the ubiquity of interfaces in software, and I may only notice it when they feel emboldened by the success of their first attempt.