this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
83 points (95.6% liked)

Linux

48652 readers
1112 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me it's: Testdisk (and Photorec) Caddy Netstat Dig Aria2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's no CLI that k wish I had a GUI for, but there's many GUIs for which I wish there was a CLI version.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The cli controls the computer while the GUI controls the user

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why would i use something so restrictive as cli tools when i can change the data directly with assembly?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

I issue electricity directly to the pins.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Not at all.They are 2 ways do the same thing. The GUI can tell you what options are available. The CLI needs you to memorise them, or go somewhere else to look them up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A lot of GUIs have less options available than their CLI equivalents. Moreover GUIs change more often, requiring you to relearn the actions to get the expected result Shells can remember the commands you used, commands are also way easier to write down on paper than a list of actions to do on a GUI And using man or --help is not going somewhere to know the options, you stay in the shell If you want to know all the features of a tool, reading the manual is also easier than browsing all the GUI

The CLI lets the user automate tasks, giving them more control over their workflow

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

GUIs can have just as many options. Sure there are programs with poor UX. Choose a good one. There are also many GUIs with no CLI alternative, or only a poor UX alternative. As the GUIs guide the user, small changes are understood right away. GUIs remember last settings all the time. Great for reuse. If you have to write a command down, for GUIs it need not be perfect. For CLI one letter wrong and it fails. Using man commands is yet another command to learn and does not work with all CLI commands. It is possible to automate GUI commands.

And even if there was some benefit to a CLI, the entire UX is so poor you can understand why most people prefer GUIs. It's the dominant way for good reason. And why most CLI users use a web browser and GUI email client.