this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
36 points (80.0% liked)

change my view

165 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I believe it was purely for reasons of expansion. I don't know exactly what our response should have been, but we need to at least acknowledge that Ukraine is defending their sovereignty and Putin/Russia are the aggressors. We should support them at least minimally.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AA5B 6 points 4 months ago

Yes, I do believe they feel justified

Russia wanted access to the Black Sea for access to or less expensive transport of oil.

Controlling Crimea gives them a much better port than anything else around there, and a big naval base they developed around it.

Russia was displeased with Ukraine’s strenghtening alignment with the USA

A lot of the reasoning behind the Warsaw Pact back in Cold War days was a buffer zone. If WWIII did happen, they wanted to keep it far from their territory. Same deal. Now they imagine NATO right up on their border and that buffer zone is looking like a really good idea. In this scenario, they also have no reason to care whether that part of Ukraine is a bombed out wasteland