this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
447 points (98.9% liked)

Fuck Subscriptions

3610 readers
1 users here now

Naming and shaming all "recurring spending models" where a one-time fee (or none at all) would be appropriate and logical.

Expect use of strong language.

Follow the basic rules of lemmy.world and common sense, and try to have fun if possible.

No flamewars or attacking other users, unless they're spineless corporate shills.

Note that not all subscriptions are awful. Supporting your favorite ~~camgirl~~ creator or Lemmy server on Patreon is fine. An airbag with subscription is irl Idiocracy-level dystopian bullshit.

New community rule: Shilling for cunty corporations, their subscriptions and other anti-customer practices may result in a 1-day ban. It's so you can think about what it's like when someone can randomly decide what you can and can't use, based on some arbitrary rules. Oh what, you didn't read this fine print? You should read what you're agreeing to.

==========

Some other groovy communities for those who wish to own their products, their data and their life:

Right to Repair/Ownership

Hedges Development

Privacy

Privacy Guides

DeGoogle Yourself

F-Droid

Stallman Was Right

Some other useful links:

FreeMediaHeckYeah

Louis Rossman's YouTube channel

Look at content hosted at Big Tech without most of the nonsense:

Piped

Invidious

Nitter

Teddit

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1306163

Njudah on Instagram

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhoRoger 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have to admit, I do hate the "companies need to make money" argument. It's true of course, but the other half is that customers need to get a good product.

Unfortunately people aren't smart customers. We've even happily accepted the "consumer" designation instead. And that really says everything.

If customers won't stop buying products that are deliberately designed to fuck with them, then that's what the companies will do. It's a downhill slope too, like with the batteries example.

You give company a finger because "it needs to make money" or you just don't care enough, they'll take the whole arm.

[–] BilboBargains 2 points 1 year ago

Totally agree. The solution is a mix of factors. Customers should understand what they are getting into when they buy something. Part of that is general education level but also product information. Regulations are a last resort and a necessary evil. A good example is the fight against producers of farm machinery. Farmers tend to maintain their machines DIY but the manufacturers are producing machines that cannot be maintained except at great cost by the dealerships. This came to court in the form of a 'right to repair' campaign and who should turn up at the hearings? The undisputed champion and final boss of closed, proprietary systems, Apple.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's okay for companies to make money. But the problem right now is that simply making profit isn't acceptable for shareholders. You need to make the maximum profit possible and keep it growing.

So here we are right now with subscription based printer.

[–] WhoRoger 2 points 1 year ago

Yea, and what I mean is that customers should reject this crap and not buy such products. But we know that only a few actually care, most will just get dragged along, and eventually they'll wear us down and subscription ink and whatever other nonsense will be normalised.

It's always like that. Look how hard have videogames devolved into just being monetisation schemes in the last couple years.