This really does not sound healthy. The game is released, for a certain amount of money. If people don't like what they get for their money, they simply should not buy it.

But by now gamers have been so trained to expect to endless content treadmills and all their ilk like mtx and battle passes that publishers/developers get egged on if they don't work on their game 24/7 and forever.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] vxx 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

We're living in a "either 1 star or 5 stars" world. There's no in between, and I fully understand that it can be frustrating and put immense pressure onto developers.

I don't know the company behind this game, but I'm not giving them the 1 star review just because I assume every tiny company is bad as well as all the big companies.

What if there's a boss that tries to protect his employees and sees the issue in extreme expectations?

Not saying it definitely is that way, but why assume the worst first?

Early access games are marketed as such, and it shouldn't come with a suprise that it's an unfinished game. Some do it better, some worse, but an early access title shouldn't be treated with expectations that reflect a finished product.

I'm not a fan of most early access titles myself though, at least not early in development. I don't want to help develop it, so I wait for an almost finished product.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

From where I sit, good and critically acclaimed games are plentiful and if you can make a game then it's easy to make a good one: just don't be a greedy idiot and make the game you want to play.

If the developer doesn't want to be badgered about finishing his game then he shouldn't be selling it unfinished, it comes with the territory. The problem is they went and complained.