Technology

59446 readers

4717 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

293

We are wasting up to 20% of our time on computer problems, says study (techxplore.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A control panel for a loader that a factory worker should be able to use is as complex as a workflow on a computer can be. And that’s very explicitly accounting for the fact that loader’s or lift’s control panel doesn’t change every fucking day and the user remembers it, so computer UIs should be simpler than those of lifts and loaders!

I design control panels. I try to keep the workflow consistent not because I see value in it, but because some asshole decided that they didn't want to pay for retraining. Really I don't care, having to retool slightly every decade or so is pretty reasonable. Especially given that the tech is always changing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Especially given that the tech is always changing.

Humans don't. Changing things is fine, making using them more complex for the same result, because another decade has passed, is not.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It has to get more complicated, more edge cases have popped up and the process is more complicated.

Look basic example. I made an uncoiler and needed to add in a reverse override. Why? Because someone one time loaded it in wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

By "more complex" I meant making other operations slower (EDIT: and harder to understand) for somebody using it, so - not this example.