this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
70 points (93.8% liked)

Games

32518 readers
3101 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
quinten
shitpostpolice
Dremor
[email protected]
70
Elden Ring – Patch Notes Version 1.12.3 (en.bandainamcoent.eu)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/games
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Just a bug fix patch which nerfs all the broken weapons. Goodbye, perfume one-shotting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Is the first Rolling Sparks change just removing that bug where you free aim it at the ground to cause it to deal all it's damage at once?

Also unsure what the second Sparks change is about.

RIP bloodfiend's. Heard it was really good.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is the first Rolling Sparks change just removing that bug where you free aim it at the ground to cause it to deal all it’s damage at once?

Yup. They also apparently nerfed how it works, so even aiming in a straight line won't deal much damage to large enemies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Lame. Sounds like they made it useless. Maybe it'll be ok for weak enemies but so is everything.

[–] micka190 1 points 4 months ago

Probably wanted to bring it in line with the other perfumes. Rolling Sparks was completely busted lmao

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

People say that Bloodfiend nerf isn't significant, like 220 -> 195 bleed buildup or somewhere along those lines. So it's probably still viable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Excellent. Was looking forward to trying that.