this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
536 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

60026 readers
3613 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL 1 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Ah! Yes. Hm. Well then . . . where do distributors get theirs from? Not Sony, presumably?

[–] kalleboo 32 points 5 months ago (6 children)

Pressed discs have a completely different manufacturing method

[–] homesweethomeMrL 5 points 5 months ago (5 children)

? Did not know that. I assumed they were essentially WORMs but otherwise identical. Do they not use the same laser or something like that?

[–] kalleboo 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pressed discs (like movies) are physically... pressed. They make a metal mould which is then stamped into melted plastic to make the pits and lands and then coated with a metal film to make the reflected backing, filling in the pits. This makes manufacturing of millions of disks extremely cheap since it takes seconds per disc. Burning commercial disks individually in thousands of burners would be way too slow/expensive.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wow just like vinyl, sort of huh? That’s fascinating, I never considered it.

[–] kalleboo 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Exactly like vinyl!

This is why when when CDs originally came out, the industry kept saying "soon CDs will be super cheap since they're so much cheaper than manufacturing tapes!" (which really DO need to be dubbed linearly, even though they can be done at like 10x speed in digital high-speed dubbers) before they realized people were still perfectly happy paying $15 for a disc.

This is also why they kept trying to make laserdisc (and RCA's CED) be a thing, since they were cheaper to mass manufacture by stamping than prerecorded video tape's slow dubbing process. It was thought that prerecorded video tapes were always going to be too expensive (originally they were like $100 a tape, hence the rise of video rental stores)

[–] homesweethomeMrL 2 points 5 months ago

before they realized people were still perfectly happy paying $15 for a disc.

Heh, well i dunno about ‘happy’, i mean they did get sued. I think I still have my check for $7 somewhere . . .

[–] homesweethomeMrL 1 points 5 months ago

I would have loved laserdiscs. The large format for art, all futuristic lookin’ - but all media degrades so maybe M-disc in laserdisc size? We’ll probably have crystal storage before then i guess.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)