US Authoritarianism

830 readers

127 users here now

Hello, I am researching American crimes against humanity. . This space so far has been most strongly for memes, and that's fine.

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: [email protected]

founded 8 months ago

MODERATORS

ChonkyOwlbear

alphanerd4

617

Supreme Court says cities can ban homeless from sleeping outside (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by alphanerd4 to c/usauthoritarianism

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Read more here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nope, personal opinion. It makes sense to me that for-profit prison systems would lobby to make homelessness a crime, to gather more workers, and to get more money from the government. I don't have a source that says "Yes, this is the reason why." but you can follow the money and make your own opinions from there.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thank you (sincerely) for going half-way. I did not know that prisons make money.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Of course, I don't see why you're getting downvoted so hard. I think that asking people to back things up with sources should be standard practice.

In this case, I don't have concrete proof, but I let you know that it's an opinion influenced by certain facts, like private prisons generating profits and them using lobbists to further their interests.

Some people, however, make wild claims or assumptions that they're pushing as pure facts, but can't produce any kind of verifiable source.

Some people are saying they don't want to do your homework for you, and just to google it. To be fair, that's all I did to get those links. But their thinking is backwards. The one who makes the claim has the burden of proof, not everyone else.

If someone makes a claim, but can't support it at all, it can be disregarded. But if someone makes a claim, and provides proof, and someone else is able to provide proof contrary to that point, now we have a debate. More proof and evidence will be required to see who is correct.

Otherwise we end up with people just firing off unverified claims, backed up with ad hominem and defended with strawmen and slippery slopes.

So keep asking people for proof and sources, more people need to be checked on their shit.