Science Memes

10905 readers

1897 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

783

I just cited myself. (mander.xyz)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

225 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mpa92643 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sure! See ISO-80000-2

Here's a link: https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/64973/329519100abd447ea0d49747258d1094/ISO-80000-2-2019.pdf

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

ISO is not a source for mathematical definitions

[–] mpa92643 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's a definition from a well-respected global standards organization. Can you name a source that would provide a more authoritative definition than the ISO?

There's no universally correct definition for what the ≈ symbol means, and if you write a paper or a proof or whatever, you're welcome to define it to mean whatever you want in that context, but citing a professional standards organization seems like a pretty reliable way to find a commonly-accepted and understood definition.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Tbh I'm just impressed you:

A) knew there was an iso standard

went to the effort of locating it

iii) posted it in respectful manner, and

e) are correct.