this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)

TechTakes

1438 readers
182 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to make a primal scream without gathering footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh facts of Awful you'll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

@dgerard @froztbyte given that anecdote from William Gibson about how realising that his first computer actually *used a spinning disk full of rust to store its data* crushed his romantic ideas about technology, this rings true

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@dgerard

I don't understand the hate for transition lenses. You don't have to get them in frames last fashionable in 1982.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I guess the point is the dude won’t have lasik.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

Lasik? Rip those eyes out and put cybereyes in! For one hole glorious year I could see in infrared. (Sadly the company went bankrupt and they repo'ed my eye, so that is why there is a hole now, at least I didn't splurge for both eyes).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@gerikson

Lasik doesn't work for every vision problem.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

That's because it doesn't use AI...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

transition lenses = photochromic lenses

(i thought for a moment it was another term for varifocals, but no, Transitions is a company that makes photochromic lenses)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Duh, my bad. I thought it was something like varifocals too.

Photochromic lenses were a nerd staple when I was a teenager. Dunno if/how popular they are now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@gerikson @dgerard I'm about to take delivery, next week, of my new photochromic varifocals

If you're thinking "sounds cripplingly expensive", you'd be right. Don't get old

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

i am the guy of that age, and i would never get anything else, and yes fuck they are

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

yeah it's a new meme format with an AI wojak generator