this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
599 points (98.7% liked)

Astronomy

4055 readers
55 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I don't know anything about moon pictures, my best attempt was not great

But how did they composite 81,000 images without worrying about atmospheric lensing distorting the proportions as it moved across the sky for 4 days? Is it just negligible?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

They didn't. What they did was take 81,000 images and then filter through, them taking the best images of each region of the Moon and then averaging and compositing those.

It isn't 81k images stitched together. It's 81k images taken in the hopes of getting enough with perfect clarity to create the composite.

[–] friend_of_satan 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Is that just the Samsung smart camera composite?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The Samsung moon actually just makes up a plausible looking moon, which is hilarious given that the moon essentially doesn't change, so they could have just overlayed reference images. Instead, you get features on the moon that don't exist.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Huh? Nah it's an old Canon 1300D. I had to hold the tripod still with sandbags while it took.

[–] friend_of_satan 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My comment was mostly sarcasm. https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/13/23637401/samsung-fake-moon-photos-ai-galaxy-s21-s23-ultra

Cool that you used a "real" camera to do it. Just the experience of doing that is satisfying even if the photos don't come out great.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Then we appreciate the Nasa images more

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Good question.