this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
72 points (89.1% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
2719 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
72
Why do you have to install Usb-Drivers on Windows, but I never had to do it on Linux? (self.technology)
submitted 4 months ago by Majestix to c/technology
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

On my Job I regularly have to install Windows PCs and sometimes even install the USB Drivers for Mouse and Keyboard to work. Why dont I have to do that on Linux ever? Seems weird not to have them installed on Windows.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I've had more than a few chipsets or periphs that worked on Windows, and worked on Linux but were.... quirky, especially when dealing with stuff like suspend states etc.

For USB3 in particular, I've found many storage devices or adaptors like to drop out partway through an longer copy process on Linux (like they'll be fine for copying a smaller amount of data, but the controller or device would reset during longer ones). This didn't seem to occur in Windows, but I'm pretty sure the copy process was also slower so guessing it's some sort of buffer or heat quirk that 'nix didn't account for in the more generic driver

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This didn’t seem to occur in Windows, but I’m pretty sure the copy process was also slower so guessing it’s some sort of buffer or heat quirk that 'nix didn’t account for in the more generic driver

If the device says it's a generic storage device (to the system that is) but actually isn't (based on your description) then it's 100% devices fault and not a Linux fault.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

That's not a distinction that users care about, or should need to care about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Honestly I think it's generally more of a bus driver issue, because it seems more tied to the motherboard than a given device