this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
1004 points (88.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21455 readers
1613 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
    •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith
    zephyr
    rtxn
    1004
    With GPL, you're programming Freedom. With MIT, you're programming for free. (lemmy.world)
    submitted 5 months ago by renzev to c/linuxmemes
    250 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    Context:

    Permissive licenses (commonly referred to as "cuck licenses") like the MIT license allow others to modify your software and release it under an unfree license. Copyleft licenses (like the Gnu General Public License) mandate that all derivative works remain free.

    Andrew Tanenbaum developed MINIX, a modular operating system kernel. Intel went ahead and used it to build Management Engine, arguably one of the most widespread and invasive pieces of malware in the world, without even as much as telling him. There's nothing Tanenbaum could do, since the MIT license allows this.

    Erik Andersen is one of the developers of Busybox, a minimal implementation of that's suited for embedded systems. Many companies tried to steal his code and distribute it with their unfree products, but since it's protected under the GPL, Busybox developers were able to sue them and gain some money in the process.

    Interestingly enough, Tanenbaum doesn't seem to mind what intel did. But there are some examples out there of people regretting releasing their work under a permissive license.

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] takeda 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    For writing an application GPL is fine if you don't want anyone to profit from your work and if they make changes, contribute back.

    Things are a little bit more complex if you are writing a library or code that is meant to be included in another application.

    If you use GPL you might get rejected even by other open source applications, as GPL might be understandable as it will change license off the application or be outright incompatible.

    This was the case with cursor library after author changed license everyone stopped using it: https://github.com/GijsTimmers/cursor/commit/885156333ac9ca335a587b1dd08964074313f026

    The most ironic thing is that he created package from stack overflow answer:

    https://github.com/GijsTimmers/cursor/blob/master/cursor/cursor.py

    The original author never said they are releasing copyright or are making it public domain.

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Isn't this why LGPL exists?

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

    It is

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

    if you don't want anyone to profit from your work

    Technically you can. There are two popular models: Lua model and RedHat model. In first you are paid to develop requeated features, in second for support.