Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5376 readers

1139 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

315

Red states strike deals to show controversial conservative videos in schools | Educational material from PragerU is now offered to public schools in six states (wapo.st)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Per the article:

Critics say PragerU lessons distort history and facts to serve a conservative worldview. Some scientists have said PragerU videos lack context and downplay climate change as climate alarmism, while the Council on American-Islamic Relations alleges some videos are anti-Muslim. Other complaints center on the nonprofit’s portrayal of slavery.

PragerU is literally paid by billionaires to push their far-right science denial

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] snekerpimp 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So, what’s the end goal? Are they trying to make “Idiocracy” a documentary? What happens when the US public no longer has the understanding or knowledge of basic science? Who will invent and innovate? Who will advance technology? Technology that all these people enjoy every day. That they stand on top of to try and control the public. That they are using to make people dumber. How short sighted are these people?

[–] Potatisen 35 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They need consumers. It's not some long game, master plan-type of thing. It's a short term thing that's just being pushed by a bunch of different lobbies/interests.

American politicians, lobbyists and general population are all drinking the same low-IQ Kool aid.

[–] snekerpimp 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I get that… but it’s kinda like China with the one child law…. No one said “hey, eventually this will make our population decline.”? It’s mind bottling that none of them thinks further than the next yacht.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Population decline was the point of the one child policy. To help stop, among other things, environmental collapse.

[–] snekerpimp 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The point of one child was not to decline the population, but to level it off, to help with resources. They left it in place waaaaaay too long and have reached a point where reversing it will be a Herculean effort.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Every advanced country is going to have population decline, as most women don't actually want to have kids. Or at least have enough kids to maintain the current population levels.

[–] snekerpimp 0 points 6 months ago

Umm, I’d like to see statistics or data on that. Sounds more like an opinion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Yes. It's exactly this. Just think about your friends/coworkers/family who have no idea what goes on politically that directly affects them and don't care.

Now double or triple that number. That's the uneducated, apathetic group Republicans need to try and hold onto power.