783
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
783 points (97.0% liked)
Technology
59574 readers
4822 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, and if we did not abandon our traditional networks then there would not be such a strong market for STARMLINK.
You could receive normal satellite internet the same way, the advantage starlink brings is that it's much lower latency than geosynchronous satellites and they're selling it for much less and more bandwith.
Normal sattelite internet is terrible
If New Zealand can manage damn near 100% cellular coverage, and we have some pretty reasonable mountains, why can't others?
Centurylink/Quest/Whatever it was before received something like a billion dollars from the Obama administration to "connect the entire nation" with modern phone service. They didn't do that.