this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
702 points (94.8% liked)

Political Memes

5502 readers
2188 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NooBoY 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think the question could be summarised as, how much is "enough"? Is it enough to live on? Enough to feel secure that you know you could pay for that big ticket item? Is that big ticket item the necessity you need or have to pay for?

And for that, alot of people have different lines that are deemed enough.

[–] AIhasUse 1 points 5 months ago

Exactly. Everyone has their own line. Some people are content to sit in the woods and live off of the land. Some people are content living a life of bartering without as many interesting things to spend their time with. The majority of people are not content no matter what they have. They are always looking for a way to get more than they have now, however much it is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The trick to justifying extinction level greed is to ask people to draw a fine line between needs and wants.

[–] NooBoY 1 points 5 months ago

You are not wrong. But there are a lot of people who would draw the line either before or after extinction level greed.