this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
475 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

60060 readers
3114 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Accounting details, sensitive credentials for sys admin use, HIPAA data, PII etc. there's just so much crap understood to be temporarily unlocked, viewed, and then immediately deleted or locked again. Even home users shouldn't turn this thing on, check your bank? Balance and account details now always available. Use a password manager? Whatever you looked at is likely captured.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Using it may not be legal for videoconferencing in states and countries where recording without notification is illegal.

Also, legalities aside, if there is any application that might be displaying the contents of one's laptop webcam onscreen, that turns it into something that logs a series of snapshots of that (and then OCRs any text that the camera can see). I can see potential problems there.

[–] NateNate60 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Microsoft's solution will be to remove the feature from Enterprise versions of Windows while keeping it around for the plebs using Pro and Home

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Their solution is to let users filter out websites in compatible browsers. This lets them blame the user for not marking sensitive websites as such. I don't know if native applications can also be filtered.

Of course they also filter out precious DRM protected content. You wouldn't steal a series of JPEGs.