Technology

59457 readers

4268 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

193

Are We in an AI Bubble? (www.youtube.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How has it helped you personally in every day life?

And if it's doing some of your job with prompts that anybody could write, should you be paid less, or should you be replaced by someone juggling several positions?

[–] egeres 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm using LLMs to parse and organize information in my file directory, turning bank receipts into json files, I automatically rename downloaded movies into a more legible format I prefer, I summarize clickbaity-youtube-videos, I use copilot on vscode to code much faster, chatGPT all the time to discover new libraries and cut fast through boilerplate, I have a personal assistant that has access to a lot of metrics about my life: meditation streak, when I do exercise, the status of my system etc and helps me make decisions...

I don't know about you but I feel like I'm living in an age of wonder

I'm not sure what to say about the prompts, I feel like I'm integrating AI in my systems to automate mundane stuff and oversee more information, I think one should be paid for the work and value produced

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your question sounds like a trap but I found a bunch of uses for it.

Rewriting emails
Learning quickly how to get popular business software to do stuff
Wherever I used to use a search engine
Setup study sessions on a topic I knew very little about. I scan the text. Read it. Give it to the AI/LLM. Discuss the text. Have it quiz me. Then move to the next page.
Used it at a poorly documented art collection to track down pieces.
Basically everything I know about baking. If you are curious my posts document the last 7 months or so of my progress.
Built a software driver (a task I hate) almost completely by giving it the documentation
Set it up so it can make practice tests for my daughters school work
Explored a wide range of topics

Now go ahead and point out that I could have done all this myself with just Google, the way we did back in the day. That's the thing about this stuff. You can always make an argument that some new thing is bad by pointing out it is solving problems that were already solved or solving problems no one cares about. Whenever I get yelled at or hear people complain about opposite things I know that they just want to be angry and they have no argument. It's just rage full throwing things at the wall to see what sticks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can always make an argument that some new thing is bad by pointing out it is solving problems that were already solved or solving problems no one cares about.

That's not the issue. I'm not a luddite. The issue is that you can't rely on its answers. The accuracy varies wildly. If you trust it implicitly there's no way of telling what you end up with. Human learning process normally involves comparing information to previous information, some process of vetting, during which your brain "muscles" are exercised so they become better at it all the time. It's like being fed in bed and never getting out to do anything by yourself, and to top it off you don't even know if you're being fed correct information.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 0 points 5 months ago

The issue is that you can’t rely on its answers.

Cough.... Wikipedia....cough. You remember being told how Wikipedia wasn't accurate and the only true sources were books made by private companies that no one could correct?

Human learning process normally involves comparing information to previous information, some process of vetting, during which your brain “muscles” are exercised so they become better at it all the time. It’s l

Argument from weakness. Classic luddite move. I am old enough to remember the fears that internet search engines would do this.

In any case no one is forcing you to use it. I am sure if you called up Britianica and told them to send you a set they would be happy to.