this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
209 points (93.7% liked)

PCGaming

6508 readers
54 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
CSFFlame
209
After you die, your Steam games will be stuck in legal limbo (arstechnica.com)
submitted 5 months ago by inclementimmigrant to c/pcgaming
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Saw a article on a large number of gamers being over 55 and then I saw this which I believe needs to be addressed in our current laws.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] inclementimmigrant 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)
  1. They'll have to provide proof of death, which every other company has to deal with when people die.
  2. What's one more thing that crappy family is going to do, not like they're going to only fight over the stream account and not fight over the house, land, or cash.
  3. I'm going to be a little snarky here and say, "Won't somebody think of the corporations!" Having to do some extra work isn't going to bring down a billion dollar company.
  4. Who cares if it's not a simple solution? A legal solution should be provided since we as gamers have paid for these games and we should have a avenue to pass them to our surviving kin or whoever we want.
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago
  1. Most companies are not international, and don't have to deal with verifying the death certificates from 100+ countries.
  2. The challenge is that dividing it up would add overhead to Steam support, especially if the estate does try to break up an account into games. Not to mention that there's really no "cash value" on digital games, since there are things like sales, giveaways, bundles, etc.
  3. It obviously won't bring them down, but assuming extra work and liability isn't something they'd do our of the goodness of their hearts.
  4. We pay to license Steam games and put them in our Steam libraries. This isn't a new idea...it was a criticism of Steam when it was new, and it was why there was so much pushback. If you're buying expensive brand-new games on Steam rather than on a DRM platform (or waiting until the cost lowers enough to be worth getting only a license), then you've been using Steam wrong.

I'm not even defending Steam here. If you want DRM-free games, buy from GOG. Steam has more games, and sometimes lower prices...but you're not buying a game that you own. It was never a secret. Hence why they marketed it as a Steam Library. You can use whatever you want in the library, but you own none of it.