this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
17 points (77.4% liked)

United Kingdom

4116 readers
147 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What we know:

Well loved

Has been suspended

~~Is paid £35,000~~

Male

Surely we can figure it out?

EDIT:

The allegations, first reported by the Sun on Friday, are that the BBC presenter paid £35,000 for explicit photos over a three-year period, starting when the teenager was 17

Sorry, misunderstood this part. Maybe we cannot figure it out

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jocanib 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please don't speculate on names. Apart from the legal risks to the poster of the name, and possibly the platform/mods, it's not right to cast aspersions without evidence on something this serious.

Names that are clearly in the clear are all good, of course. As is solid evidence, which will likely come soon enough.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

which will likely come soon enough.

Yeah all the top paid presenters are scrambling to say it wasn't them, I imagine their agents are sticking a rocket up the BBC for having to do this when this could, apparently, been dealt with months ago. So the Been will need to resolve this quickly just to limit the damage.

[–] zebs 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What can the BBC reasonably do though?

It sounds like (from the BBC press release) that they made contact with the family involved but received no reply. So it would seem that no evidence has been passed to the BBC.

Without any evidence naming the presenter would likely be devistating to their career, rightly so if actually guilty. But if innocent their career will forever be dogged by the false accusations.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's kind of why it's the perfect stick to beat them with - they can't win. The Sun newsroom must be really quite pleased with itself, which is never a good sign.

We'll have to wait and see what comes out of this - serious questions need to be asked if the family didn't give the BBC evidence at the time (of something that could be a child sex offence) but waited months and told The Sun (although they say they haven't received payment). Something isn't quite right with the stories emerging but it will take a while for the truth to shake out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the Been

New Lemmy-speak for the Beeb, or genuine typo/autocorrect?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Genuine typo. He meant The Bean, as in Mr, whom it seems has beeb in charge recently.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The latter. It's in my dictionary but autocorrect does it's best to change it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fracking autocarrot!