this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Bay Area

1331 readers
7 users here now

Discussion for all things Bay Area.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honest question: Is it really accurate to characterize funding for a public utility or service as a bailout? Or are taxpayers just getting value for their tax money?

I would think a bailout would be when we're giving public money to a for-profit entity that massively mismanaged itself.

[–] superbeans 10 points 1 year ago

I mean there's a decent case that BART hasn't been managed very well. I'm a big supporter of public transit but I worry that there won't be enough oversight for this money.

[–] fubo 5 points 1 year ago

Is it really accurate to characterize funding for a public utility or service as a bailout?

No, it's not. Consider: We don't refer to highway funding as "bailing out" the automobile industry, for instance; even though the automobile industry couldn't very well sell very many cars if there weren't highways to drive them on.