this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
302 points (96.3% liked)

World News

39000 readers
3076 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Two decades of U.S. policy appear to be rooted in a mistaken understanding of what happened that day. archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Remember kids: Iran is the bad Middle East autocracy and Saudi Arabia is the good Middle East autocracy.

US foreign policy has always been and will always be interest based rather than value based, but they will use moral arguments and threat inflation to drum up support for their misadventures abroad.

[–] Badeendje 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Or.. one is bad and the other one is way worse.

Anyway this just means that a straight B-line for no longer being fossil fuel dependent is just more important.

If we can then combine that by sourcing the oil from countries that do not perform stonings and public executions in stadiums, of call it a win.

Keep in mind that not 50 years ago, we had an oil crisis that showed how incredibly depended we where, and the EU learned the hard way what energy dependence on Russia meant.

Solar, Wind and a hydro/Geothermal/nuclear baseload with at least 60 months of stored fission material would be my hope.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or.. one is bad and the other one is way worse.

The thing that always amuses me about this is that Iran was a burgeoning liberal democracy until the CIA and MI6 toppled it in 1953, installing a previously overthrown autocrat (overthrown by said forces of democracy), who ruled until 1979, when he was overthrown by religious hard liners, who really only had mass support because the autocrat was too authoritarian.

And the reason the U.S. and Britain overthrew their democracy? They nationalized their oil industry to give profits back to their people, which entailed taking over refineries and wells ‘owned’ by British Petroleum.
The U.S. created their own boogeyman in the area because they wanted to give a corporation near-free access to Iran’s oil. Which in turn lead to the oil crisis and instability in the region.
The U.S. has really got to stop trying to put out fires while covered in crude oil.

[–] Badeendje 5 points 5 months ago

"Amusing" and yeah the geopolitics of the 50's and 60's. The gift that keeps on giving. Especially the interventions done in name of big corporations are wonderful examples of nightmares that just don't end.

[–] FlyingSquid 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Which one is the way worse one? Because I can't really think of a way in which one is way worse than the other. I wouldn't ever want to live in either place if I were a woman or a queer person.

[–] Badeendje -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think Iran is worse personally across the board. But I intentionally left that out of my comment as it does not really matter. And for minorities and women both are .. unsafe.

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well then you would be wrong.

Iran never let anything like this happen- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Mecca_girls%27_school_fire

So unless you think a country that lets girls burn to death rather than go out in the street uncovered is superior to a country that doesn't...

But please do tell me the ways that Iran does things in terms of human rights that significantly differ from the ways that Saudi Arabia does things.

[–] Badeendje 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nah Squid, as I said I'm not looking for this discussion. I'm definitely not going into an who can out evil who debate as there is so much out there. I'm also not looking to defend any of these countries either. As I said, bad and worse.

[–] Maalus 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You aren't looking to defend countries yet you call one "bad" and the other "worse".

[–] Badeendje 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Absolutely, and I'm plenty entitled to my opinion.

In my original post I purposefully did not specify my opinion on which is worse as I fully understand that choosing one as more evil over the other is subjective and depends on your perspective and priorities.

Squid asked a question, fully expecting my answer to be as it was, in order to perform a gotcha. And I'm not interested in having a slapfight on which country is more evil.. as the list of horribleness for each of the countries is so sickeningly long.

But in the end both countries are hellholes, tthat I would not wish my worst enemy to live in.

Edit: I'm just sad that this leads to downvotes.

[–] Maalus -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Your original post literally contains "one is bad and the other is way worse". You started out from a non-neutral position. Then people called you out, and you got defensive saying that you aren't going to go into "who's worse". Which again, you already did. There is no slapfight without your subjective opinion being unbalanced in the first place.

[–] Badeendje 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I left it to the reader to fill in which is which.. the definition of neutral. You also think one is worse than the other and fill in the names different than me.

So calling me out in this case means: looking for a slapfight. And you are too. Thanks but no thanks, I'll quit this thread now.

[–] Maalus 1 points 5 months ago

Nope, you literally implied "one is bad - Saudis, the other one is worse - Iran". That's why you got called out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

100% agree, no longer being oil dependent would make the middle east a saver place (as well as having many other advantages).

But even the green revolution needs cheap labor, recourses, and rare-earth metals. Countries that do not want to play game and want to nationalize key industries for instance, will be coerced financially or militarily by greater powers (be it the West, China, or Russia).

So the idea of one country being worse than the other is not really relevant and moreover a known strategy for getting war support. I am happy that I don’t live in Iran or Saudi Arabia, but escalating conflict with either of them will not improve anybody’s life. Look at Syria or Libya.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

iran is pretty regressive (at least the government and the governing bodies) but i do love how the us always says iran is so evil and yet they gave them a whole bunch of weapons in exchange for money that the us could use to fund terrorists in central america in the 80s.