this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
86 points (91.3% liked)

World News

38976 readers
2017 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The IRA were terrorists who killed their own people. They literally killed other Irish people, including other IRA sects. Look up the IRA leaders; a lot of them died in IRA-ordered bombings or assassinations. There was no unified IRA.

That's why the president of Ireland is denouncing them. That's what the article is about. The British being bad doesn't mean the IRA was good. They can both be bad and there are more than two parties in every situation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They can both be bad and there are more than two parties in every situation.

All that nuance is making my head hurt. Can't I just say "The enemy of my enemy is my friend"? It sounds so much simpler and snappier.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They can both be your enemy, friend.

Didn't you go to middle school?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Sorry, irony didn't translate well there. It was supposed to be a parody of the binary mindset "I don't wanna think about nuance and individual differences, just enemies and allies".

Also, forgive my cynicism, but I'm not confident that every middle school teaches that level of critical thinking. I'm not actually sure we even touched on that in high school. I'm from Germany, but my school was rather centrist with respect to the Overton Window at the time. Much of history was painted rather black and white and avoided complicated details about morality.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I'm 99% sure that the user above you is being sarcastic.

[–] Squizzy 1 points 5 months ago

There was a civil war and divisions of the structure, but there was a structure and overall goal. I wouldn't say leaders like that because they may have led a branch and of course it being a paramilitary force they did not have HR nor qualms about taking lives so there was violent disagreements.

They most certainly were bad, but Ireland would not be what it is today without the IRA. ThebTaoiseach is not the president.