929
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Source

I see Google's deal with Reddit is going just great...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FooBarrington -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If your issue with the result is plagiarism, what would have been a non-plagiarizing way to reproduce the information? Should the system not have reproduced the information at all? If it shouldn't reproduce things it learned, what is the system supposed to do?

Or is the issue that it reproduced an idea that it probably only read once? I'm genuinely not sure, and the original comment doesn't have much to go on.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The normal way to reproduce information which can only be found in a specific source would be to cite that source when quoting or paraphrasing it.

this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
929 points (99.6% liked)

TechTakes

980 readers
38 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS