Australia

3662 readers

18 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
Politics, post it to Australian Politics
World News/Events, post it to World News
A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

205

Keeping pet cats indoors would save millions of native animals and billions of dollars. So what's stopping us? (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Broader adoption of keeping cats safe at home would have large benefits for cat welfare, human health, local wildlife and even the economy. So, should cat owners be required to keep their pets contained to their property?

The answer to the question is obviously "yes".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think this is the the thread with the highest ratio of downvoted top level comments to upvotes ones I've ever seen on Lemmy

[+] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Ah I'm just here for the drama, so it suits me just fine

Jokes aside, it did surprise me a bit. Considering Lemmy tends to be quite left leaning and big into climate activism and stuff of that nature, I really didn't expect there to be this many people who disagree with the OP. I've never really seen more than 1 comment per thread that goes against the common opinion

[+] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

People also only care about the environment for as long as it has nothing to do with their personal life

Plane travel i think is Australian's biggest problem on this. I once had a friend spitting daggers at me for suggesting the amount of waste caused by travelling to a place like Europe every year needs to be stopped (read: trips spaced out further) until we access a different less carbon intensive transport.

I thought the point i's making was really, really moderate considering the impacts, but my friend turned on me like i'd just insulted their mothers favourite budgie.

It was a surreal moment.

[–] mojofrododojo 1 points 7 months ago

there's nothing logically controversial, it's cat owners who can't be bothered to care properly for their responsibilities. If you take a pet, it's your responsibility. If you let that outside to murder the wildlife, it's incompetence and malice. Cat owners just don't want to take responsibility.