Louis Rossmann

A customer RMA'd their ROG Ally handheld console for a faulty joystick replacement - only to have Asus refuse warranty repair due to a tiny scratch on the top of the device.

Asus then invoiced the customer $200 to carry out the joystick repair outside of warranty, or have the handheld console returned to them in a disassembled state.

Pretty low from Asus in my opinion 🤦‍♂️ can't say I'm a fan of supporting a company who treats their customers like this.

Louis' video is related to other coverage on this by the Gamers Nexus channel, which covers this in much more detail.

Summary

1. Companies intentionally make repairable products unfixable by withholding proprietary parts, affecting various industries.
2. Profit-driven motives lead manufacturers to prioritize disposable models, disregarding consumer rights of ownership.
3. The issue of unrepairable products extends beyond specific brands, impacting consumers across the board.
4. Lack of access to essential parts hinders independent repair technicians and limits consumer choices.
5. Even high-priced products like televisions can have privacy concerns, regardless of brand or cost.
6. Recognizing and addressing the trend of unrepairable products is crucial to protect consumer rights.
7. Blackberry the cat provides unexpected entertainment during the video.

Summary

1. Changes in product terms after purchase create frustration and a sense of unfairness among consumers.
2. Sony’s requirement of a PlayStation Network account for the Hell Reavers game adds inconvenience and raises concerns about data security.
3. Refund policies that deny requests based on playtime limits contradict the ability of companies to change terms after the sale.
4. Sony’s history of security breaches and poor customer support erodes trust and adds to customer frustrations.
5. Exclusion of certain countries in account registration limits access to games for some players.
6. Gamers seek alternatives from companies/studios that don’t require additional accounts or impose restrictive terms.
7. There are numerous enjoyable games available that do not require constant updates or internet connections.

Summary

1. Consent is a fundamental principle that modern companies should uphold. The script highlights numerous instances where companies have violated user consent, raising concerns about their understanding of this concept.
2. Accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of is a manipulative tactic employed by some companies. The script exposes the hypocrisy of major automakers who accused independent mechanics of enabling stalking while engaging in data stalking themselves.
3. The use of charged rhetoric like “rapist mentality” aims to draw attention to the alarming actions of these companies and create awareness. The script argues that stronger language may be necessary to bring about change and recognition of the issues at hand.
4. The script emphasizes the need for individuals to hold themselves to higher standards when it comes to valuing consent. It encourages people to be more aware of their own actions and interactions, setting an example that surpasses the behavior of these companies.
5. The script highlights the importance of pushing back against the erosion of consumer rights and the need for people to become engaged and advocate for change. It calls for recognition of the regressive steps being taken in terms of user rights and the necessity to reverse this trend.

Article discussed in video:

Amazon Prime ads help tech giant drive profits [Mitchell Labiak | Apr 30 2024 | BBC] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9ez72kn1rlo

Summary

1. Amazon’s decision to insert ads into paid content did not result in a loss of subscribers but rather led to a 24% increase in revenue in the first three months of this year. This indicates that many customers are accepting or even embracing the inclusion of ads.
2. The increasing pervasiveness of ads in every aspect of life, from streaming services to banks and even HDMI devices, calls for a mass boycott of advertising. Only by collectively rejecting ads can individuals combat their intrusion into paid content and personal data.
3. Protecting oneself from unwanted advertisements can be achieved through various methods, such as using ad blockers, VPNs, or routers with ad-blocking features. These tools help individuals maintain control over their content consumption and avoid unwanted ads.
4. The increase in revenue from ads may lead to a future where consumers have less ownership and control over the content they purchase. Advertisements may become an integral part of paid content, eroding the original purpose of paying for an ad-free experience.
5. Taking a stand against intrusive advertising is crucial to protect personal data privacy and assert individual sovereignty over possessions. By refusing to tolerate ads and actively seeking ways to block them, individuals can send a message that they value their privacy and control over their content consumption.

Short Summary

1. YouTube’s Legal Team sent a letter regarding a developed application
2. The video creator expresses frustration with YouTube’s enforcement of rules and lack of transparency
3. The video creator proposes solutions to the problems faced by content creators on the platform
4. The video creator discusses the issue of paying for premium services and receiving a subpar experience
5. The video creator addresses the request to delete customer data and clarifies their data storage practices
6. The video creator asserts their intention to continue offering the application and their willingness to engage legally if necessary

Summary

1. The video creator highlights the inconsistent enforcement of rules on YouTube, which leads to content creators being banned without clear guidelines.
2. The video creator emphasizes the importance of addressing the problems faced by content creators on the platform and proposes solutions to improve the user experience.
3. The video creator criticizes the concept of paying for premium services while receiving a lower quality experience and explores examples from various industries.
4. The video creator clarifies their data storage practices, ensuring that customer data is not stored, and encourages users to support content creators through donations.
5. The video creator asserts their determination to continue offering the application and mentions the possibility of legal action if necessary, highlighting their seriousness and commitment.

Timestamps:

• 00:00 - Intro
• 00:22 - Youtube Legal Team's 2nd letter
• 01:39 - FUTO's response to Youtube Legal Team's 2nd letter
• 02:40 - FUTO's response to Youtube Legal Team's 1st letter
• 03:59 - The problems we're trying to solve
• 04:08 - Problem #1 - random bans
• 05:46 - Problem #2 - broken comment system
• 06:26 - Problem #3 - worse treatment when paying
• 09:39 - Problem #4 - "storing customer data"
• 10:10 - The difference between this & others
• 10:25 - This is NOT 4 kids in a college dorm room
• 10:42 - My promise

Short Summary

1. US carriers have been selling customers’ location data without consent, violating privacy laws.
2. The FCC fined major carriers, but the fines were insignificant compared to their net income.
3. Customers will bear the cost as carriers increase prices to offset the fines.
4. Limited competition in the US market prevents customers from easily switching carriers.
5. The FCC’s weak penalties send a message that carriers can continue exploiting customer data.

Summary

1. The FCC’s fines on US carriers for selling customer location data were woefully inadequate, with penalties amounting to less than 1% of the carriers’ net income. This undermines the deterrent effect of fines and fails to hold carriers accountable.
2. Limited competition in the US market exacerbates the issue, as customers have few alternatives to choose from. This lack of choice enables carriers to pass on fines to customers through increased prices, leaving consumers with no real recourse.
3. Carriers’ argument that the sharing of location data was not clearly regulated under customer proprietary network information (CPNI) rules is disingenuous. It is the equivalent of claiming ignorance when violating someone’s privacy, and it highlights the need for clearer regulations in this area.
4. The lack of significant penalties and the weak response from the FCC sends a message to carriers that they can continue to exploit customer data without facing severe consequences. This perpetuates a cycle of disregard for privacy and consumer rights.
5. Customers deserve stronger protections and meaningful penalties for privacy violations. The current system allows carriers to profit from the sale of customer data, while customers bear the financial burden and loss of privacy. Regulatory bodies need to take more decisive action to safeguard consumer interests.

Edit:

• fixed error on date, 26 not 28, wording

Short Summary

1. The speaker discusses their frustration with the FTC and their support for the right to repair movement.
2. They share a personal story about hiring an employee with a non-compete agreement and their dislike for such agreements.
3. Emphasizing the importance of knowing what you're getting into in personal and business relationships, using the example of hiring based on recommendations rather than random hires.
4. Highlighting the benefits of offering better pay and working conditions to retain employees.
5. The speaker believes that non-compete agreements are detrimental to both employees and employers in a capitalist system.
6. They argue that non-competes limit competition and incentivize employers to mistreat employees.
7. The speaker supports the idea of not having non-compete agreements to encourage businesses to improve their practices and treat employees better.
8. They believe this leads to employees receiving better pay and working in environments where they are valued.
9. The speaker also shares personal experiences of hiring employees who were mistreated in previous jobs and significantly increasing their salaries.
10. Overall, they advocate for laws that enhance overall freedom and prevent the restriction of individuals' opportunities.

Short Summary

1. The video discusses the importance of freedom in repairing items and owning what you've purchased.
2. There is disappointment expressed in the lack of autonomy for users of a particular software called BWE Software, which reportedly monitors user activity and bans users without reason.
3. Examples of complaints from users who have been banned for using competitor software are shared.
4. Caution is advised against spending money on software that may not be worth it.
5. The speaker shares their experience of being wrongly accused of associating with mod games by the owner of a software company.
6. The speaker emphasizes the importance of ethical behavior over strict legal actions and criticizes surveillance tactics used by some software companies.
7. Alternative solutions for software control, such as selling licenses or offering automatic refunds for revoked access, are suggested.
8. The importance of not alienating users and the need to weed out tyrannical behavior within the industry is highlighted.
9. Commitment to making any developed software available for free without restrictions is expressed.
10. Viewers are encouraged to engage in the discussion and provided with links for further information on the topic.

Short Summary

1. The speaker discusses the removal of headphone jacks from products, attributing it to various internal motivations within companies such as engineers simplifying their work, marketing departments aiming to sell more Bluetooth headphones, CEOs seeking better financial results, and shareholders wanting increased profits.
2. These decisions are not made with the intention to deceive consumers but rather stem from competing interests and priorities within the company.
3. The speaker reflects on their own experiences running organizations and working in different roles, emphasizing that such decisions are often driven by practical considerations and not necessarily malicious intent.
4. They discuss how unethical behavior can be masked by our brains, similar to how we may overlook negative traits in someone attractive, highlighting the importance of self-reflection and taking responsibility for potential ethical shortcomings.
5. By assuming they are the problem, individuals strive to analyze their actions and behaviors more deeply to uncover hidden patterns.
6. The discussion extends to larger issues of ethics in companies like Apple, highlighting the shift from unintentional oversight to malicious behavior when ethical concerns are pointed out but not addressed.

Short Summary

1. The speaker is frustrated with the current process of repairing devices, especially Apple products.
2. They mention the difficulty of finding and purchasing used parts for repairs, contrasting it with the past practice of buying parts directly from manufacturers.
3. The speaker expresses annoyance at the lack of customer service and accountability from both brokers and companies like Apple.
4. They reminisce about the old system of buying parts directly from manufacturers, despite its own challenges.
5. The speaker discusses their experience with purchasing parts for repairs, expressing frustration with the changing systems and restrictions imposed by manufacturers like Apple.
6. They reflect on the challenges of sourcing quality parts and the limitations placed on independent repair shops.
7. The speaker expresses reluctance to comply with Apple's requirements for their repair program and emphasizes their disinterest in making further videos on the topic.
8. They convey a sense of resignation towards the evolving landscape of repair services and the impact on their business.

Edits:

• fixed dr name, added timestamps that were provided in video desc.

Short Summary

1. The speaker discusses a case involving a woman named Lacy who experienced complications after gallbladder removal surgery performed by Dr. John Uecker in Texas.
2. Lacy suffered from issues such as pain, nausea, vomiting, and bile leak due to negligence by Dr. Uecker, leading to multiple surgeries and prolonged hospitalization.
3. Lacy decided to take legal action against Dr. Uecker for the damages caused by the surgical errors.
4. The summary highlights the severe consequences of the surgical error, including the development of a bile leak, a Boma, and a biliary bronchial fistula.
5. The video also discusses a rare medical condition where a woman developed a fistula between her biliary system and bronchial tree, leading to coughing up bile.
6. The doctor involved was protected by immunity laws in Texas, as there was no tangible personal property misused during the surgery.
7. The loophole in the law allows medical professionals to escape accountability for errors in judgment or negligence that do not involve the direct misuse of equipment.
8. Lack of consequences raises concerns about the lack of incentive for doctors to improve their practices and holds them accountable for their actions.
9. The speaker emphasizes the importance of holding doctors accountable for medical mistakes, regardless of whether they were made with a scalpel or bare hands.
10. They stress the need for fairness, ethics, and personal responsibility in the legal system and encourage viewers to advocate for changes in laws regarding accountability in medical malpractice cases.

Timestamps:

• 00:00 - Intro
• 00:07 - My prior critique of New York
• 00:27 - Forced arbitration & the culture of forced arbitration
• 01:05 - My hair
• 01:26 - The best barber shop on earth
• 01:38 - Lacey's botched gall bladder removal from John Uecker
• 02:47 - Lacey's attempt at legal action
• 04:02 - Lacey's resulting issues from the botched surgery
• 05:27 - Going over exclusions to governmental immunity
• 06:05 - If you screw up someone with medical instruments, you're liable
• 06:30 - If you use your hands, you can screw up whatever you want - Miller, 51 S.W.3d at 587–88 & Dallas Cnty. Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Bossley
• 07:08 - Lacey's lawyer points out why she is screwed
• 07:23 - Miller, 51 S.W.3d at 587–88 creates insane loophole
• 07:35 - TL;DR OF ENTIRE VIDEO
• 08:37 - An analogy from bill burr
• 08:47 - An analogy from southpark cable company episode
• 08:58 - It's not democrat vs. republican, it's accountability vs. irresponsibility
• 10:02 - More reviewing of her health issues
• 10:41 - What I hope is different between New York & Texas
• 11:05 - Can the Texas Legislature do better than New York?
• 12:02 - Reach out to your local representatives

Short Summary

1. The video discusses Chase Bank's launch of Chase Media Solutions, a new digital media business connecting 80 million US customers with brands by selling their personal financial data for targeted advertisements.
2. Criticisms are raised about this practice, emphasizing the lack of consumer benefit and invasion of privacy, contrasting it with platforms like YouTube where ads provide value in exchange for free services.
3. Concerns about privacy and data sharing by companies like Chase are highlighted, pointing out how personal transaction data is used for targeted advertising without consent.
4. Frustration is expressed with the lack of transparency from companies and the importance of protecting personal data by using ad blockers and VPNs.
5. The speaker plans to move their accounts from Chase due to data sharing practices and encourages viewers to be cautious about sharing personal information online.
6. The speaker mentions that the interruptions in their videos are not due to mistakes or forgotten lines, but because their cat disrupts the recording by entering the room.
7. The importance of boycotting abusive industries is highlighted, suggesting that content creators should ask for value after providing content, rather than upfront.
8. The issue of Chase Bank using transaction data for targeted advertising is emphasized.
9. The speaker interacts with their cats, Blackberry and Oreo, throughout the video, expressing frustration with interruptions and trying to prevent premature ending of the video recording.
10. Despite the interruptions, the speaker reassures Oreo and tries to finish recording the video.

Short Summary

1. The speaker discusses the concern with Roku disabling televisions unless users agreed to a forced arbitration agreement.
2. They highlight the issue of companies having the power to stop devices from working and change terms at their discretion.
3. The speaker criticizes Roku for disabling TVs due to a data breach, questioning their lack of accountability.
4. They compare this situation to a hypothetical scenario involving a small business owner disabling a customer's device without consent.
5. The speaker emphasizes the importance of standing up against such practices and questions why many companies are implementing forced arbitration agreements recently.
6. They discuss how companies make it difficult for customers to opt out of certain policies, such as requiring certified or priority mail to opt out digitally.
7. They draw parallels to historical events like the Townshend Acts and the Tea Act in the late 18th century, emphasizing that it's not about the money but about principles and respect.
8. The speaker urges consumers to stand up against such practices and assert their rights.

Short Summary

1. The speaker discusses the importance of the right to repair and the challenges faced in repairing wheelchairs.
2. They mention a funding group advocating for wheelchair repair rights and supporting the Mobility Independence Foundation's initiative for open-source wheelchair plans.
3. The Foundation aims to provide affordable wheelchairs and improve accessibility for those in need.
4. The speaker expresses gratitude for receiving a $200,000 grant from Aaron Wolf to support this cause.
5. Thomas Quer from the Mobility Independence Foundation shares his personal experience of being in a wheelchair since childhood and his mission to address challenges faced by wheelchair users.
6. The speaker discusses their introduction to the concept of Open Source Hardware and the importance of repairability in equipment.
7. They highlight challenges in accessing parts and schematics for repairs, drawing parallels with issues in consumer electronics like MacBooks and wheelchairs.
8. They share a personal experience with wheelchair repair and the difficulties in obtaining specific parts.
9. The speaker also touches on the high costs associated with medical equipment and insurance coverage, giving an example of a seat cushion costing $2,400 through medical systems.
10. They explain how they were able to source materials at a lower cost by contacting manufacturers directly.

Short Summary

1. The speaker discusses the recurring issue with Macbook hard drive cables, specifically the A1278 model from 2012.
2. Despite expectations of durability, the cable often breaks, causing frustration for technicians and customers.
3. The speaker expresses disappointment in using Apple parts due to their lack of reliability compared to non-Apple components.
4. They highlight the challenges of dealing with Apple products, such as the butterfly keyboard and associated class-action lawsuit.
5. The speaker feels guilty when installing OEM Apple parts, knowing they may fail shortly, unlike non-Apple parts that are more likely to last.
6. They express frustration about customer service and using Apple parts in their business.
7. They discuss the challenges of dealing with customer inquiries about Apple parts and the lack of available alternatives.
8. The speaker emphasizes the issues with Apple parts, specifically mentioning the hard drive cable problem in certain models.
9. They reflect on their improved mood since no longer working directly on Apple products and delegating the task to their employees.

Associated links with video:

• 2021 REPAIR WHITEPAPER: https://tinyurl.com/58b2px54 [Link will go to this: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1foiQZPyR58j5Xu33s1Du7wh1xwWs1X_e/view]
• Lina Khan – FTC Chair on Amazon Antitrust Lawsuit & AI Oversight | The Daily Show [21:07 | Apr 01 2024 | The Daily Show] https://youtu.be/oaDTiWaYfcM
• https://gizmodo.com/jon-stewart-confirms-apple-show-ai-with-ftc-chair-1851380884
• https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/0f/Time_youcover01.jpg
• FTC delivers death blow to anti-repair lobbyists & their disingenuous arguments [8:29 | May 17 2024 | Louis Rossmann] https://youtu.be/ZKALUEoRd7E
• Is FTC management demoralizing staff out of effective antitrust enforcement? [13:48 | May 14 2022 | Louis Rossmann] https://youtu.be/LuUkKbB67iY
• Let's read a VTV/Viceland TV show contract. [51:16 | Sep 23 2024 |Louis Rossmann] https://youtu.be/zxKtH5OnxI4
• I was wrong about the Henrik Huseby case. Let's go over the new information. [41:05 | Jun 29 2019 | Louis Rossmann] https://youtu.be/xKEdi6vXMrU
• How journalists lose the trust of their readers. [18:48 | Jul 19 2019 | Louis Rossmann] https://youtu.be/YzDE7ipLcW0
• VICE's bankruptcy was earned: here's why [15:18 | May 02 2023 | Louis Rossmann] https://youtu.be/Nj3YbdgZUO4

Timestamps:

• 00:00 - Intro
• 00:17 - Apple cancelling Jon Stewart
• 00:34 - Who is Lina Khan?
• 00:59 - My contributions to the FTC
• 02:05 - I became a little blackpilled on this but that's besides the point
• 02:31 - Why would Apple start a show with Jon Stewart if they are this sensitive to what he has to say, or who he speaks to?
• 03:38 - You know what type of content Jon Stewart makes!
• 04:16 - Even someone worth 20-50 million dollars can be deleted if a tech company doesn't like them
• 05:19 - Why I didn't sell out to vice TV
• 05:55 - Why not being able to criticize the content network is a serious problem
• 08:48 - Why it matters
• 09:27 - The point of the internet!

Short Summary

1. The speaker discusses John Stewart's show called "The Problem with John Stewart on Apple TV," where he could talk about various topics.
2. The show was canceled because Apple did not want him to talk to FTC chair Lena Khan, known for her critical views on big tech companies like Google, Apple, and Facebook.
3. The speaker mentions creating a white paper on the right to repair and engaging with the FTC but not receiving the desired response.
4. Expresses disappointment in the lack of support for right to repair initiatives.
5. Questions why Apple would start a show with John Stewart if they were not willing to address the issues he typically discusses, especially when facing scrutiny from regulators like the FTC.
6. Discusses censorship and control over content by large companies like Apple.
7. Highlights the case of John Stewart being reportedly pulled off the air for criticizing Apple, despite having a large audience and influence.
8. Shares their own experience with Vice Television, where they were asked to sign a contract limiting their ability to upload content freely on their YouTube channel.
9. Emphasizes the importance of being cautious as a content creator, as signing such contracts can make one vulnerable to censorship and control by platforms or companies.
10. Underscores the need for alternative platforms prioritizing freedom of expression to prevent worsening censorship issues in the future.

Edit:

• added yt associated links and added timestamp section

Associated links with video:

• The Unseen Cost of Integrity: Edison Motors and a Corruption Scandal? [8:11 | Apr 05 2024 | Edison Motors] https://youtu.be/BVqfsTwC3HM
• https://www.leg.bc.ca/documents-data/debate-transcripts/42nd-parliament/5th-session/20240404am-House-Blues
• https://www.biv.com/news/commentary/rob-shaw-bcs-opposition-parties-demand-probe-into-alleged-government-grant-kickbacks-8557329
• Lobbyists imply right to repair helps domestic abusers, pushes racism and redlining! [5:17 | Aug 27 2020 |Louis Rossmann] https://youtu.be/EozPi1qmH44

Timestamps:

• 00:00 - Intro
• 00:10 - Edison Motors
• 02:42 - Edison Motors Grant application
• 03:23 - Where this all goes downhill...
• 03:53 - Where this becomes bs
• 08:44 - Cat
• 09:15 - editing
• 09:35 - I support edison motors
• 10:48 - Edison Motors' own words

Short Summary

1. Edison Motors focuses on making electric truck conversion kits using off-the-shelf components that users can repair themselves.
2. The company aims to serve the commercial trucking market with economically viable electric trucks.
3. These trucks utilize regenerative braking to recharge the battery while going downhill, reducing diesel fuel consumption and emissions.
4. Edison Motors values repairability, sustainability, and ownership of products.
5. The company applied for a grant from the government of British Columbia but was denied.
6. Suspicion arose regarding potential conflicts of interest in the grant application process.
7. Despite meeting criteria for lower emission vehicles, Edison Motors was denied the grant.
8. Concerns were raised about potential corruption involving a company offering grant writing services.
9. The NDP government blocked an official investigation into a program run by the company.
10. The speaker expresses frustration with the process and believes there should be a serious investigation into the grant allocation process.

Links in video description:

• https://patents.google.com/patent/US20230388589A1/en
• https://ballotpedia.org/Massachusetts_Question_1,_%22Right_to_Repair_Law%22_Vehicle_Data_Access_Requirement_Initiative_(2020)
• [Lobbyists imply right to repair helps domestic abusers, pushes racism and redlining!] https://youtu.be/EozPi1qmH44
• [Roku's Ransom: Agree to Forced Arbitration or Lose Your TV!] https://youtu.be/AddtrV6UFFs
• https://web.archive.org/web/20240405170217/https://old.reddit.com/r/LinusTechTips/comments/1beqyuj/linus_would_have_been_raped_by_chevy_and_he_might/
• https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/0f/Time_youcover01.jpg
• [FTC delivers death blow to anti-repair lobbyists & their disingenuous arguments] https://youtu.be/ZKALUEoRd7E
• [Is FTC management demoralizing staff out of effective antitrust enforcement?] https://youtu.be/LuUkKbB67iY
• [Let's read a VTV/Viceland TV show contract.] https://youtu.be/zxKtH5OnxI4
• [I was wrong about the Henrik Huseby case. Let's go over the new information.] https://youtu.be/xKEdi6vXMrU
• [How journalists lose the trust of their readers.] https://youtu.be/YzDE7ipLcW0
• [VICE's bankruptcy was earned: here's why] https://youtu.be/Nj3YbdgZUO4

Short Summary

1. The speaker discusses concerns about the company Roku and their practices related to consent.
2. They criticize Roku for forcing users to agree to new terms to continue using their television, likening it to a violation of consent.
3. Mention of a patent application by Roku that would allow advertisements to be inserted into content even without user agreement.
4. Argument that users who pay for content should not be subjected to ads.
5. Advice for viewers to use ad-blocking tools to avoid unwanted advertisements and maintain their privacy.
6. Emphasis on the importance of using ad blockers as a consumer to avoid being bombarded with intrusive ads.
7. Frustration with the predatory nature of the advertising industry, where personal data is mined without consent.
8. Encouragement for viewers to be mindful of their privacy and support content creators and journalists in ethical ways.
9. Highlighting the need for viewers to take a stand against practices that invade privacy and to respect privacy settings on devices like smart TVs.
10. Mention of hidden settings on smart TVs that allow for data collection and personalized advertising.

Links in video description:

• [Wyze cameras let other people view her home: why cloud security is an oxymoron] https://youtu.be/RkZl7FBipXA
• https://web.archive.org/web/20240224075538/https://www.reddit.com/r/wyzecam/comments/1aulfw4/i_was_watched_by_someone/
• [Cloud connected cameras are a scam - VAVA & SunValleyTek disable products after the sale] https://youtu.be/fAHXUcYhDj0
• [Arlo cameras take the L with disposable junk] https://youtu.be/PrtbYu1OYhY
• ["innovation" is a dog whistle for screwing you over] https://youtu.be/ap-uZDnTSzk
• https://frigate.video/
• [Google reports customer to police over doctor photos: this is why privacy matters] https://youtu.be/CE0EB5bXj14
• https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/21/technology/google-surveillance-toddler-photo.html

Short Summary

1. The speaker expresses concerns about cloud-connected security cameras, citing examples of companies like Vava, Sun Valley Tech, Arlo, and Wyze.
2. They prefer security cameras that connect to a local NVR with hard drives to avoid risks associated with internet connectivity, monthly fees, and potential data breaches.
3. The speaker criticizes the trend of modern cameras limiting users' ability to connect to their own systems and highlights the issue of forced arbitration in the industry, exemplified by TPLink's cameras.
4. They argue that companies should provide options for local NVR usage to prevent data breaches and hold them accountable for negligent security practices.
5. The speaker expresses concern about a forced arbitration agreement imposed by camera manufacturers that require users to use their own cloud-hosted solutions to access their cameras.
6. They believe that users should have the right to hold companies accountable in court, especially in cases where personal data is compromised due to negligence.
7. The speaker highlights the history of arbitration and expresses a desire to see forced arbitration declared illegal in the United States.
8. They emphasize the importance of consumer rights and express hope to not have to make another video on this topic in the future.

Short Summary

1. The speaker contemplates turning their repair channel into a sex toy repair channel due to challenges in sourcing Macbook repair parts.
2. They discuss the profitability of specific repairs and express frustration with instruction manuals and customer service.
3. The speaker demonstrates opening a remote control to fix water damage, showcasing their repair skills and attention to detail.
4. They mention past experience with a Blackberry Curve 8330 and a pride tool.
5. The speaker discusses various tools and equipment used for repairing electronics, emphasizing the importance of proper soldering techniques and avoiding excessive heat cycles.
6. They emphasize the importance of proper ventilation and safety measures when working with soldering equipment.
7. The speaker recounts a conversation advising a company to focus on their original product rather than engaging in legal battles over a new product.
8. They share a negative experience of being unexpectedly charged $500 for shipping by a company they had been loyal to for 10 years, expressing frustration with the company's behavior.
9. The speaker reflects on moments of feeling overwhelmed and making impulsive decisions to find peace in a remote location.
10. They emphasize the importance of quality products and maintaining a legacy of integrity.

Edit:

• links fixed and added missing yt link

Links in video description:

• https://www.smartwool.com/customer-service/terms-of-use.html
• [How ABC Fitness & Best Fitness Nashua scam customers with INTENTIONALLY DIFFICULT to cancel policies] https://youtu.be/BVKhW9pzmYQ
• [LA Fitness' cancellation process is a scam] https://youtu.be/XdQHuLHBP6g
• [Roku's Ransom: Agree to Forced Arbitration or Lose Your TV!] https://youtu.be/AddtrV6UFFs
• https://techcrunch.com/2024/03/05/roku-disables-tvs-and-streaming-devices-until-users-consent-to-forced-arbitration/
• [Blizzard locks you out of account if you don't agree to new terms; no ownership, forced arbitration] https://youtu.be/5YU8xw_Q_P8

Short Summary

1. Importance of forced arbitration in cases involving expensive products that can harm consumers, such as laptops or smartphones with design defects.
2. Companies like Roku and Blizzard using forced arbitration agreements manipulatively, making it difficult for consumers to opt out of these terms. 3 Criticism of companies opting consumers into arbitration agreements via email, while requiring them to send a physical letter to opt out, which is inconvenient and deters many people from taking action.
3. Unfair and limiting nature of this unequal process on consumers' rights.
4. Negative experience shared with Best Fitness NAS, a gym with challenging cancellation procedures.
5. Criticism of the gym's practice of easy online sign-ups but difficult cancellations, likening it to a disrespectful and scammy practice.
6. Argument for customers to be able to cancel online if they signed up online and not be forced to go through such a hassle.
7. Frustration with companies like LA Fitness that have similar cancellation policies.
8. Emphasis on the importance of consent and criticism of assuming consent if there is no response, comparing it to a disturbing scenario involving dating.
9. Strong condemnation of companies engaging in such behaviors, likening it to a "rapist mentality" and stating that companies engaging in such behavior deserve to lose customers.

Short Summary

1. The speaker shares their experience trying to get a $200 statement credit by signing up for a credit card when booking a flight with American Airlines.
2. Despite initially being declined for the card, they later received a new account from City Bank with a credit limit.
3. They highlight receiving a physical card with an annual fee of $99, which they consider a scam.
4. The speaker mentions having 3565 Advantage miles but finding out they need more miles to book a flight, indicating discrepancies in the rewards program.
5. They caution against credit cards with annual fees and advise against falling for such scams.
6. The speaker discusses their frustration with misleading advertising of the card and the limitations of using miles only with a specific vendor.
7. They touch on the concept of "buy now, pay later" services and the potential pitfalls of accumulating debt.
8. The speaker talks about their efforts to avoid debt in their life, even in the early days of their business.
9. They emphasize the importance of being aware of service terms, annual fees, and the actual value of rewards to avoid falling into misleading credit card schemes.
10. The speaker criticizes certain companies like American Airlines and Citibank for deceptive practices related to credit card sign-ups and fees, urging viewers to push back against unethical business practices becoming more common in various industries.

Edit:

• fixed summary format

Links in video description:

• https://web.archive.org/web/20240216060015/https://support.apple.com/iphone6plus-multitouch
• https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/05/court-docs-show-apple-knew-about-the-bendiness-of-the-iphone-6-6-plus/
• https://web.archive.org/web/20230115075503/https://support.apple.com/iphone-7-no-service
• https://web.archive.org/web/20161119162632/https://www.apple.com/support/macbookpro-videoissues/
• https://support.apple.com/keyboard-service-program-for-mac-notebooks
• [Mar 31 2023] https://web.archive.org/web/20230331225139/https://www.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/127w9e4/comment/jegu7u7/?context=3

Short Summary

1. The video discusses the issue of forced arbitration in consumer agreements, specifically focusing on Google's arbitration clause in their sales terms for the purchase of a Pixel 8 phone.
2. The clause prevents customers from taking legal action against Google through a class action lawsuit in the event of a dispute related to the product.
3. The importance of holding companies accountable through legal means is highlighted, citing examples such as Apple's past engineering failures and how class action lawsuits have led to free repairs for customers.
4. The speaker discusses issues with Google Pixel phones, such as random boot loops and green streaks on the screen, which they claim can be fixed with a software upgrade.
5. Mention is made of the high cost of the phones and the poor service compared to competitors.
6. Emphasis is placed on the importance of class action lawsuits as a means for customers to hold companies like Google accountable for faulty products.
7. Criticism is directed towards the trend of companies limiting consumers' ability to seek legal recourse through forced arbitration.
8. The speaker advocates for consumers' rights to hold companies accountable through legal means and expresses concern about companies selling defective products without consequences.