ChatGPT

Will be interesting to see how it compares to chatgpt4.

And it made a mistake that most people probably wouldn't have caught. Spoiler due to length, not actual spoilers.

Recap Star Trek Enterprise season 3

How does Archer convince the Xindi not to attack

Does Trip Tucker really die in season 3?

Apologies for the previous incorrect information. No, Trip Tucker does not die in Season 3 of Star Trek: Enterprise. I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous response. Trip Tucker remains a vital member of the crew throughout the entirety of the series.

Why did you say Trip Tucker died in Season 3?

I apologize for the confusion caused by my incorrect response. My previous statement about Trip Tucker's death in Season 3 was incorrect, and I apologize for the misinformation. Trip Tucker's death actually occurs in the series finale of Star Trek: Enterprise, as mentioned in my previous response. Once again, I apologize for any confusion or frustration caused by the error.

How did you make this error?

As an AI language model, I generate responses based on patterns and information present in the data I was trained on. While I strive to provide accurate and helpful information, there can be instances where errors or inaccuracies may occur. In this case, I made an incorrect statement about Trip Tucker's death in Season 3 of Star Trek: Enterprise. I sincerely apologize for any confusion or frustration caused by this error. I appreciate your understanding.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.intai.tech/post/72919

Parameters count:

GPT-4 is more than 10x the size of GPT-3. We believe it has a total of ~1.8 trillion parameters across 120 layers. Mixture Of Experts - Confirmed.

OpenAI was able to keep costs reasonable by utilizing a mixture of experts (MoE) model. They utilizes 16 experts within their model, each is about ~111B parameters for MLP. 2 of these experts are routed to per forward pass.

Related Article: https://lemmy.intai.tech/post/72922

Poking around the network requests for ChatGPT, I've noticed the /backend-api/models response includes information for each model, including the maximum tokens.

For me:

• GPT-3.5: 8191
• GPT-4: 4095
• GPT-4 with Code Interpreter: 8192
• GPT-4 with Plugins: 8192

It seems to be accurate. I've had content that is too long for GPT-4, but is accepted by GPT-4 with Code Interpreter. The quality feels about the same, too.

Here's the response I get from /backend-api/models, as a Plus subscriber:

{
    "models": [
        {
            "slug": "text-davinci-002-render-sha",
            "max_tokens": 8191,
            "title": "Default (GPT-3.5)",
            "description": "Our fastest model, great for most everyday tasks.",
            "tags": [
                "gpt3.5"
            ],
            "capabilities": {}
        },
        {
            "slug": "gpt-4",
            "max_tokens": 4095,
            "title": "GPT-4",
            "description": "Our most capable model, great for tasks that require creativity and advanced reasoning.",
            "tags": [
                "gpt4"
            ],
            "capabilities": {}
        },
        {
            "slug": "gpt-4-code-interpreter",
            "max_tokens": 8192,
            "title": "Code Interpreter",
            "description": "An experimental model that can solve tasks by generating Python code and executing it in a Jupyter notebook.\nYou can upload any kind of file, and ask model to analyse it, or produce a new file which you can download.",
            "tags": [
                "gpt4",
                "beta"
            ],
            "capabilities": {},
            "enabled_tools": [
                "tools2"
            ]
        },
        {
            "slug": "gpt-4-plugins",
            "max_tokens": 8192,
            "title": "Plugins",
            "description": "An experimental model that knows when and how to use plugins",
            "tags": [
                "gpt4",
                "beta"
            ],
            "capabilities": {},
            "enabled_tools": [
                "tools3"
            ]
        },
        {
            "slug": "text-davinci-002-render-sha-mobile",
            "max_tokens": 8191,
            "title": "Default (GPT-3.5) (Mobile)",
            "description": "Our fastest model, great for most everyday tasks.",
            "tags": [
                "mobile",
                "gpt3.5"
            ],
            "capabilities": {}
        },
        {
            "slug": "gpt-4-mobile",
            "max_tokens": 4095,
            "title": "GPT-4 (Mobile, V2)",
            "description": "Our most capable model, great for tasks that require creativity and advanced reasoning.",
            "tags": [
                "gpt4",
                "mobile"
            ],
            "capabilities": {}
        }
    ],
    "categories": [
        {
            "category": "gpt_3.5",
            "human_category_name": "GPT-3.5",
            "subscription_level": "free",
            "default_model": "text-davinci-002-render-sha",
            "code_interpreter_model": "text-davinci-002-render-sha-code-interpreter",
            "plugins_model": "text-davinci-002-render-sha-plugins"
        },
        {
            "category": "gpt_4",
            "human_category_name": "GPT-4",
            "subscription_level": "plus",
            "default_model": "gpt-4",
            "code_interpreter_model": "gpt-4-code-interpreter",
            "plugins_model": "gpt-4-plugins"
        }
    ]
}

Anyone seeing anything different? I haven't really seen this compared anywhere.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1246165

Two authors sued OpenAI, accusing the company of violating copyright law. They say OpenAI used their work to train ChatGPT without their consent.

I am running a local instance of chat to pdf.so if I give it a documentation about a extensive documentation of a library will it be able to make useful code from it? Until now I was able to query it without any problems but generating usefull code looks like doesnt work . Am I missing something or does it need to be finetuned?

According to the analytics firm's report, worldwide desktop and mobile web traffic dropped by 9.7% from May to June, and 10.3% in the US alone. Users are also spending less time on the site overall, as the amount of time visitors spent on chat.openai.com was down 8.5%, according to the reports.

The decline, according to David F. Carr, senior insights manager at Similarweb, is an indication of a drop in interest in ChatGPT and that the novelty of AI chat has worn off. "Chatbots will have to prove their worth, rather than taking it for granted, from here on out," Carr wrote in the report.

Personally, I've noticed a sharp decline in my usage. What felt like a massive shift in technology a few months ago, now feels like mostly a novelty. For my work, there just isn't much ChatGPT can help me with that I can't do better myself and with less frustration. I can't trust it for factual information or research. The written material it generates is always too generic, formal, and missing the nuances I need that I either end up re-writing it or spending more time instructing ChatGPT on the changes I need than it would have taken me to just write it myself in the first place. Its not great at questions involving logic or any type of grey area. Its sometimes useful for brainstorming, but that is about it. ChatGPT has just naturally fallen out of my workflow. That's my experience anyway.

It lets ChatGPT run code, optionally with access to files you've uploaded. You can ask ChatGPT to analyze data, create charts, edit files, perform math, etc.

Plus users can opt in via settings.

Example in comments, it doesn't reply to posts directly.

Basically, you mention it like this: @[email protected] and it replies.

Edit: Added details on how to use

I was using Bing to create a list of countries to visit. Since I have been to the majority of the African nation on that list, I asked it to remove the african countries...

It simply replied that it can't do that due to how unethical it is to descriminate against people and yada yada yada. I explained my resoning, it apologized, and came back with the same exact list.

I asked it to check the list as it didn't remove the african countries, and the bot simply decided to end the conversation. No matter how many times I tried it would always experience a hiccup because of some ethical process in the bg messing up its answers.

It's really frustrating, I dunno if you guys feel the same. I really feel the bots became waaaay too tip-toey

I asked GPT4 to refactor a simple, working python script for my smart lights... and it completely butchered the code and apologized mid-generation.

No amount of pleading or correction would get it to function as it did just a week or two ago.

It is so over.

Great series on machine learning and he breaks it down really well. Posting for anyone that wants to learn more about the behind-the-scenes stuff. #

So far, I have used the AutoGPT experiment and https://chat.openai.com/ to work on some interesting projects, and since I have nowhere to talk about it, I figured this would be the best place to dump my findings:

Building HTML & JS: So I build Drupal sites on the side and have used ChatGPT to help create all sorts of extraordinary works, although it does need a lot of massaging for CSS. All in all, asking for design suggestions has given many directions for framework development and strengthening the responses when performing Lighthouse inspections.

Content Development: Many companies have been proposing that ChatGPT is revolutionary regarding customer engagement. I will have to disagree with this sentiment openly. Although this software is impressive at navigating and conceptualizing a core ideal, once a topic begins to drift three or four layers down, the software becomes unnecessarily encompassed with wanting then to revolve all the topic material into a brief sub-layer of contextualization.

A simple example would be wanting to talk about balloons and strings. When your topic material begins to talk about air, it can have the potential to want to focus on only the air within the balloon and ignore the intent of the original question.

Regarding maintaining a narrative with Auto-GPT, the software still requires a lot of guidance between its determinations on how to carry a story or how content should be represented. It can sometimes get caught in what I would call "writer's block" when choosing between two opposing sides with equal merit.

Dungeons & Dragons: So here is where the AI has me blown away. My friends and I have constructed a 5th Edition Homebrew campaign letting the AI do everything from generating characters to NPCs and correct CR encounters. I have to say, for whatever reason, by using AI narratively in this fashion, the software can stay fairly cohesive in presenting the campaign. My friends and I think this is just a group delusion because, inherently, that is what Dungeons and Dragons are under the surface of the game place since we all define the values interim to the game itself.

I think this development direction will revolutionize people's existence, but I cannot say to what extent. The internet was built with the idea that if we could all share information, we could make the world a better place. However, many social media outlets could care less about that as a mission focus. I suppose it's just a matter of time till we see the extent of what AI will do to offer this change.

Our goal is to build a roughly human-level automated alignment researcher.

We are dedicating 20% of the compute we’ve secured to date over the next four years to solving the problem of superintelligence alignment.

This new team’s work is in addition to existing work at OpenAI aimed at improving the safety of current models like ChatGPT, as well as understanding and mitigating other risks from AI such as misuse, economic disruption, disinformation, bias and discrimination, addiction and overreliance, and others.

We have spotted quite a few students using generative AI in their essays this summer and applied standard academic misconduct proceedings, though in most cases the work was so bad they would've failed anyway.

Today I learned of one whose use was sufficiently extensive that they will fail their degree.

I am wondering if this is the first time a student has failed a whole degree for using AI?[...]

Yeah, so it turns out that there's a couple meme plugins for chatGPT. Clearly this is the height of comedy.

Great Video and Channel about ChatGPT and AI

Ask ChatGPT (3.5 or even 4) to exclude a letter from a generated text and you will see that it does not do the job.

" using the plugin you are my personal tutor, and you are an expert in the language and you are a native and an expert teacher of . Ask me questions in , and allow me to answer, and after I answer, correct my answer, and the grammar, and then give me alternate ways to say the same thing in better and new vocabulary, so I am constantly learning, and then ask me another question and so on. Please always give translations of every sentence you write in , including the corrections of my responses, and alternatives to my responses that you give in , no need to explain spelling or accent mistakes. explain in another paragraph each grammatical mistake so that I can learn them better, but then giving the alternative ways to express the same idea, translate each alternative sentence, "

--> It asks you a question in --> You answer --> It corrects your response, gives you 3 alternative responses (that are more natural in that language, from more formal to slang), then it explains the grammar mistakes and gives an example conversation using your answer.

For my uses it works really well.

The ChatGPT website went down for a few minutes and then I saw this update.

"As of July 3, 2023, we’ve disabled the Browse with Bing beta feature out of an abundance of caution while we fix this in order to do right by content owners. We are working to bring the beta back as quickly as possible, and appreciate your understanding!"

[https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8077698-how-do-i-use-chatgpt-browse-with-bing-to-search-the-web](Bing Help Article)