The Greens have always been against prohibition more broadly, but they can articulate their reasoning better than I can: https://greens.org.au/news/media-release/greens-secure-amendments-vaping-legislation-and-will-support-passage-through
zero_gravitas
Yeah, I don't see why they shouldn't be treated exactly like cigarettes.
From October that'll pretty much be the case, except only purchasable at a pharmacy. I can't see why they shouldn't be sold at servos, etc., but I don't think it's a massive problem in terms of personal freedoms. It'll give pharmacies a cash boost, and maybe even cause expansion of their opening hours in some cases, which could be helpful.
In any case, I think that the deal the Greens got is probably the best one Labor were ever going to give.
Here's a good article of 'panda diplomacy' for anyone interested: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-12-09/what-is-china-panda-diplomacy/103185260
This is definitely a step in the right direction.
It seems likely, though, that they'll end up with something like the 'Super PACs' (Political Action Committees) they use as a workaround in the US.
Nice to be noticed! Thanks for moderating โฅ๏ธ
Shortly after, Mr Dreyfus spoke on the ABC's Afternoon Briefing where he directed his anger about the issue towards the Greens leader.
"I think that the Greens political party and particularly the leader of the Greens political party have got something to answer for here in the way that they have been encouraging criminal damage of MPs electorate offices, encouraging really riotous behaviour, sometimes violent behaviour, that has been occurring outside electorate offices," Mr Dreyfus said on the program.
Yeah, that does seem pretty defamatory. Maybe the meaning of 'encourage' could be weaseled about by the defence if it does go to court, but "they have been encouraging criminal damage" doesn't seem very ambiguous. If he'd said 'they have been encouraging protests resulting in criminal damage' he might have more of a leg to stand on.
If you want scientists to be able to do science, they need support from admin staff doing admin.
About 65% felt the job cuts would impact CSIROโs ability to put out good research and support Australian industries.
โLess support staff means more work for an already stretched research workforce,โ one anonymised respondent wrote.
He can't claim ignorance ๐
The high quality zingers we've come to expect from Shorten don't come cheap!
Tingle wasn't talking about that in her original remarks. The bit about The Australian's considerable coverage on supposed anti-semitism was just meant to illustrate the Murdoch papers' rank hypocrisy in their beat-up around her remarks.
Half the independents got in on a campaign that they would basically be Liberals except giving a shit about climate change, so we shouldn't really be surprised. Allegra Spender was out there the other day calling the uni encampments anti-semitic ๐
๐ต ... is that the Chattanooga Choo Choo? ๐ต