zephyreks

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

And a good chunk of Canadian emissions (about half) are due to O&G extraction and burning fossil fuels for transportation. It's a simple problem to solve.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)

The West's data is literally, demonstrably false to the point that it's legitimately harmful to our climate goals. In the short-term, natural gas is indisputably worse than coal, maybe even 2-3x worse. Even in the long-term, natural gas is worse than coal when looking at observed methane leakage rates. The US' emissions reductions are a fucking lie.

Meanwhile, China hasn't exactly been hiding that they're reliant on coal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you're right about that, my bad.

I was thinking more in terms of the core tech teams - there's a decent EA presence here as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Well, I've already established you can't take Western GHGe numbers at face value... What's your point? Trust nobody and nothing?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I mean, if someone else wants to start producing solar panels and wind turbines...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

There's already been a confirmed F-35 damaged by a "bird strike" over Syria... The F-35 was certified against bird strikes to a higher standard than most other American jets. Given the amount of lies coming out of the IDF in the Gaza conflict, I wouldn't be surprised if the F-35 was targettable by Russian S-200/S-300 systems and the IDF is covering it up to avoid absolutely destroying the international reputation of the F-35.

The problem is, Canadian F-35 operations in the Arctic (really, the only area we have to defend against Russia) would almost certainly require drop tanks. In that scenario, the F-35 is fucked. This is even as F-35 maintenance requires the use of American military contractors that can be weeks or even months away, particularly if we do decide to operate F-35s out of Arctic bases.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Nationalize it. This degenerate "business comes first" bullshit is costing us key talent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Screw Bell. Nationalize telecoms.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Fuck Rogers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

You can also ask yourself why the blockade on Cuba still exists despite every UN vote going the exact same way...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

If the government could step in and just build housing instead of adopting neoliberal bullshit, that would be great thanks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

If we're subsidizing O&G so much, why don't we just nationalize?

 

The fleet’s mission-capable rate — or the percentage of time a plane can perform one of its assigned missions — was 55 per cent as of March 2023, far below the Pentagon’s goal of 85 per cent to 90 per cent, the Government Accountability Office said on Thursday.

Part of the challenges stem from a heavy reliance on contractors for maintenance that limits the Pentagon’s ability to control depot maintenance decisions. Delays also arise from spare parts shortages, inadequate maintenance training, insufficient support equipment, and a lack of technical data needed to make repairs.

Because of the Pentagon's inane IP laws, maintenance on these planes is a bureaucratic nightmare: defense contractors are able to limit maintenance of these things to only those they contract because of IP restrictions and are not required to teach the military jack shit. Meanwhile, they're essentially a paperweight half the time because they're not getting proper maintenance.

How are we supposed to patrol the Arctic with a plane that needs an American private subcontractor to perform essential maintenance on it?

 

The fleet’s mission-capable rate — or the percentage of time a plane can perform one of its assigned missions — was 55 per cent as of March 2023, far below the Pentagon’s goal of 85 per cent to 90 per cent, the Government Accountability Office said on Thursday.

Part of the challenges stem from a heavy reliance on contractors for maintenance that limits the Pentagon’s ability to control depot maintenance decisions. Delays also arise from spare parts shortages, inadequate maintenance training, insufficient support equipment, and a lack of technical data needed to make repairs.

Because of the Pentagon's inane IP laws, maintenance on these planes is a bureaucratic nightmare: defense contractors are able to limit maintenance of these things to only those they contract because of IP restrictions and are not required to teach the military jack shit. Meanwhile, they're essentially a paperweight half the time because they're not getting proper maintenance.

How are we supposed to patrol the Arctic with a plane that needs an American private subcontractor to perform essential maintenance on it?

 

Many restaurants in Vancouver have begun to tack on fees (mandatory 18% service charge, mandatory 7% kitchen service fee, etc.)

Given that these costs are NOT optional and cannot be opted out of, shouldn't they be considered a part of the cost of a purchase? Shouldn't the fees be reflected in the price listed on the menu? Transparent pricing means that we know how much we can actually expect to spend on something. It gives consumers more information to make decisions.

 

As our government becomes more and more polarized, what can we do to ensure that facts and data hold out?

I'm not suggesting that lying should be illegal (in fact, it's often unintentional), but when an MPs statement can later be proven to be false, shouldn't they be forced to publicly apologize?

The truth shouldn't be political.

 

As we lead up to 300 days since the municipal election, what is everyone's opinion on Ken Sim and ABC Vancouver?

What have they done well? What have they done poorly? What would you like to see?

view more: ‹ prev next ›