Sure, I'm on board as long as the fix isn't to cut other social safety nets.
zbyte64
joined 9 months ago
Shit that kept me up last night:
2024: Lawyers using AI to make bad legal arguments
2025: Judges using AI to make bad legal arguments
DOGE: great news, we're using AI to get through the immigration backlog.
Damn, I guess I'll just have to download Redbook then
Meanwhile ICE is racially profiling people leaving a grocer in Bakersfield.
What laws are preventing competition in the CRM space?
I mean it depends on the context of how UBI is going to get paid for. If it is funded by a wealth tax then I am on board. But that's not how the powerful proponents of UBI say it should be funded. Andrew Yang would have us take it out of Social Security to pay for it but you don't hear him say we should uncap Social Security contributions.
Yeah, because LLMs have shown they understand language and aren't bullshitting us. /s
Like I get this might generate new leads to explore, but to say it's a virtual cell as if the model is somehow self-consistent is malpractice.
AI is maturing into what exactly?
How to alienate your daughter:
This only convinces me AI can replace venture capitalists, not that it can do any actual work.
The revolutionary potential of a media platform is inverse to how mainstream it has become. Lemmy and mastadon don't need to be big to be influential because the people who show up to those platforms are (relatively) engaged in their AFK communities.
Ahh yes, dumb people are too stupid to make the right choices so they deserve whatever is coming to them. The important thing is that we don't blame the systems that misinform people because it's the fault of the individual for being misinformed. /s