yggdar

joined 2 years ago
[–] yggdar 8 points 4 months ago

+1 from Belgium!

[–] yggdar 2 points 4 months ago

As the great operation begins.

[–] yggdar 13 points 4 months ago

Prices always trend upwards. That is inflation, and our current system requires inflation to function.

[–] yggdar 67 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It is a hardware failure. Screens are complex and sensitive parts that are exposed to a lot of (ab)use. What is cryptic about that?

[–] yggdar 18 points 5 months ago

I agree, it looks nice in my opinion. It doesn't look like the house itself is crooked. It's just asymmetrical furniture, which I find fun to look at!

[–] yggdar 66 points 5 months ago (2 children)

we think you'd be best with a bigger team with a better support network

Sounds like they think you're not independent enough for the position. If it is a small team, they might need someone who can immediately start being productive, while they think you will need more coaching to get up to speed.

No need to drag any disabilities into this.

[–] yggdar 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, if

  1. Wireshark identifies it as a single stream
  2. Wireshark sees gibberish "TCP" and not an SSH connection
  3. The gibberish comes after the SSH stuff that you could see (the stuff in there is going to be the handshake, my bad, that is a bit of a technical term)

Then we can be quite confident that your connection is indeed encrypted!

And of course, you're welcome!

[–] yggdar 114 points 5 months ago

Just get uBlock Origin instead. Years ago I made the switch and never looked back!

[–] yggdar 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

If the timestamps line up, maybe Wireshark just doesn't manage to understand the entire exchange. What could happen is that Wireshark sees the SSH handshake, and after that it might become just encrypted gibberish due to the encryption. In that case the SSH traffic could just show up as "some kind of TCP".

Do you see an SSH handshake, followed by random crap on the same ports?

(I'm not a Wireshark expert, just an IT guy trying to help!)

[–] yggdar 8 points 5 months ago (5 children)

TCP is on a lower level than SSH, usually SSH uses TCP as its underlying transport layer. TCP as such is not encrypted, but it can of course be used to transport encrypted data.

Are those packages not part of the same SSH connection according to Wireshark?

[–] yggdar 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Any liquid is drinkable, some even more than once!

[–] yggdar 7 points 5 months ago

The superior solution would clearly be a team crapmatch. That way you can do both at the same time!

view more: ‹ prev next ›