yesman

The article is not about how the AI is responsible for the death. It's likely that the woman would have died in the counterfactual.

The question is not "how effective is AI"? The question is should life or death decisions be made by an electrified Oracle at Delphi. You must answer this question before "is AI effective" becomes relevant.

If somebody was adjudicating traffic court with Tarot cards, would you ask: well how accurate are the cards compared to a judge?

I don't see how the fact that security was tighter than normal at the assassination attempt is anything but an embarrassment to the US government.

There's only one thing that matters: ratings

Donald J. Trump

I love that it says "early results" as a hedge on certainty.

It's way easier to believe those formations were trees than it is to accept that something cut them down. (natural tree stumps are rarely flat on the top)

Only thing more pathetic than another aging comedian who can't cope that they've fallen behind the times, is the stan who thinks that their bitter complaints is a kind of philosophy.

This chart is misleading. It just shows "discretionary" spending which leaves out Medicare Social Security, and Medicaid. (We spend considerably more on those programs than the entire military)

None of your reasoning follows. You think the shooting is suspicious, but have no evidence to believe it was a "false flag". Don't accuse others of not playing make-believe correctly.

Somebody just watched the classroom scene in StarShipTroopers.

Most AAA guns have duplex mounted barrels so if you fly like this they can't hit you.

Love is just something that happens to you. You don't get to understand it.

Having a romance makes you an expert on love the same way getting hit by a car makes you a mechanic.