wsweg

joined 2 years ago
[–] wsweg 1 points 2 years ago

It’s still faster than non-fast charging. Fast charging also creates way more heat, so your battery killer argument seems a bit moot. You also ignored the most important part of being able to rest it on your chest while charging it, lol. I’ll give it to you that the ports are quite durable.

[–] wsweg 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“Boy” has historically been used in a belittling way towards black people in the US.

[–] wsweg 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

MagSafe charges super fast and it magnetizes to the back of your phone. Much better than using a port that can wear out over time. Plus, you can rest your phone on your chest while laying down, even if it’s charging. I wasn’t convinced of wireless charging until I got a 15w MagSafe charger.

[–] wsweg 1 points 2 years ago

They’re referring to the US

[–] wsweg 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This meme has been finely aged. Look at those compression artifacts, lmao.

[–] wsweg 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] wsweg 1 points 2 years ago

Based on your replies to my comments, I agree with you a lot. I haven’t been saying that we shouldn’t transition away from car-focused infrastructure and living. Rather, OP’s pipe-dream of banning cars and solving the infrastructure/living issue in 5 years is ridiculous.

[–] wsweg 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, OP has no perspective on logistics for that undertaking. It’s quite comical that they actually believe that it’d be something possible in 5 years.

[–] wsweg -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which is why it’s not the right solution to emitting less pollution. It would take far longer than we have until we’ve fucked the planet completely at the rate. That’s why switching to green vehicles is a far more achievable goal. Humans are selfish and they’ll burn the world if their short-term livelihood is at stake.

[–] wsweg -1 points 2 years ago

No, most traffic isn’t. A large portion of the population would be just as well off if they used public transport. However, there’s also a portion that the complete banning of road vehicles would be extremely detrimental to their livelihoods.

[–] wsweg 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Where’s all this rail infrastructure coming from? If cars are banned it will take exponentially longer to complete. What does the population do in the meantime?

view more: ‹ prev next ›