winky9827b

joined 1 year ago
[–] winky9827b 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Must be awesome having your head buried so deep in the sand that you can drink straight from the water table.

[–] winky9827b 6 points 11 months ago
[–] winky9827b 4 points 11 months ago

Nah she just likes to take work home with her. Doesn't have to be her work, clearly.

[–] winky9827b 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I will pour my heart, soul and life savings into an AOC for president campaign as soon as she decides she's ready.

[–] winky9827b 4 points 11 months ago

This person pays attention folks.

[–] winky9827b 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most people commenting here didn't hear the questions beyond what clips they heard via the media. The ignorance is astounding. And in a hard core anti-trump voter.

[–] winky9827b 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No. The questions posed by the Supreme Court centered around whether there was merit in allowing any single state, which may have arbitrary criteria and or processes, to effectively eliminate a candidate from the ballot, and if so, under what constraints. Ours a valid question. Where is the line? If you allow this precedent, how might it be abused by others?

[–] winky9827b 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm a voter. I will 'do shit'. It's a fucked up world and many people fit your generalization, but it's the job of reasonable people everywhere to educate others and promote sanity and optimism wherever possible.

[–] winky9827b 8 points 1 year ago

Better than nice one boot

[–] winky9827b 2 points 1 year ago
[–] winky9827b 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not according to WAPR

view more: ‹ prev next ›