whygohomie

joined 1 year ago
[–] whygohomie 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Translation: His wall to wall Philly TV ads pushing straight-up hate to turn out men failed, and he's freaking the fuck out.

[–] whygohomie 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Alexa, turn off the lights.

[–] whygohomie 27 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Because the world's richest also own all the major media outlets.

[–] whygohomie 6 points 1 month ago

Pages? Like a static display made from dead trees?

[–] whygohomie 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Probably a customer not realizing the preparation and complaining that the cheese wasn't cheesey or as velveeta-ey as they were used to, and malicious compliance ensued.

Fuck it. Give them more cheese. 👹

[–] whygohomie 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The Teamsters president is conflating Democratic refusal to support a blanket national right to strike with continued Republican support for union busting efforts that take away worker's rights and fund unions under the guise of an illusory "right to work," and does not actually guarantee a job or anything or the sort.

It's a tortured, strange, apples to oranges comparison so he can "both sides" the issue even though only one side is an existential threat to worker's rights and the concept of unions. It's a helluva position to take as the president of a union.

[–] whygohomie 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So, it turns out that the guy whose inherited fortune was earned in Apartheid- era South Africa has some pretty crazy views on race.

Who knew?

[–] whygohomie 4 points 1 month ago

The German immigrants are eating our Schnitzel dogs!!?

-Campaign propaganda for low info voters from 1828.

[–] whygohomie 5 points 4 months ago

An impasta because I'm a human bean.

[–] whygohomie 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If he had more votes in the primary, then that could have been true despite the superdelegates. As it would be true for any other candidate.

But he/they didn't, and here we are moping over something that didn't happen years ago while the USSC lays the final stones in the foundation for an actual dictatorship.

Bold strategy. Let's see how that works out.

[–] whygohomie 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

So Biden could order the army to attack the USSC? He just has to declare it officially like Michael Scott?

I joke, but it's a dark, dark day for this country and the rule of law.

[–] whygohomie 58 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The court was already packed with activist judges appointed under suspicious or hypocritical circumstances who then lied to Congress during their confirmations about their deference to precedent on a host of issues only to the engage in a massive power grab from Congress. Subsequent action to rebalance the court is not court packing.

view more: next ›