webadict

joined 2 years ago
[–] webadict 44 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That guy is the worst fucking developer I've ever known.

[–] webadict 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Nudity is also not inherently sexual. You can be naked for reasons outside of having sex, such as cleaning yourself, using the bathroom, changing outfits, sunbathing, relaxing, etc. None of those are inherently sexual.

Wearing drag is not sexual either. It's been a thing for centuries, and that's just the easily identifiable stuff.

Wearing kink gear is not inherently sexual, though I can understand that you don't recognize that because it has connotations. But you can wear it without it being a sexual act.

"Expressing" sexuality is purposefully vague. Is kissing expressing sexuality? Is holding hands? Children do those. That would be an expression of your sexual orientation. You aren't really making any sense.

[–] webadict 25 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Making everything sexual for children while not even acknowledging the sickness of it.

Same shit said about gay people.

Being gay isn't sexual. Being straight isn't sexual. Being trans isn't sexual. Someone saying they are a girl is not sexual. Someone saying they are a boy is not sexual.

You see how none of this relates to sex?

The real answer is that a lot of people don't really understand being trans. A lot of people used to the same way about gay and lesbian people. Conservatives tried to rally hard against gay and lesbian people, but that proved unpopular. Trans people don't have that same protection. So, they'll go after it until people finally get it.

Conservatives only have identity politics.

[–] webadict 3 points 2 months ago

It's too much like the real anti-fluoride arguments, man. I can't recognize it, man.

[–] webadict 2 points 2 months ago

Additionally, I called him childish because he was mocking others, and I pointed that out to him with his own quote.

He was not arguing in good faith, and to believe otherwise is to, frankly, underestimate him.

[–] webadict 2 points 2 months ago

I did answer his questions. He didn't like the answers. They weren't either-or question, and it can, indeed, be answered with answers he doesn't like, because those questions were leading.

[–] webadict 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is, and I don't say this lightly, one of the dumbest conclusions I've ever seen someone jump to.

Might as well say that fluoride in the water caused software developers, lmao.

[–] webadict 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Hey, yo, I got one! I once argued with FS about something where he continuously attempted to goad me, argued disingenuously, and acted childishly, and when I rightfully called him out on all of that, he removed my comment. It was a rather small abuse of power, but I have seen him act righteously indignant, especially when he is called out for acting like a child. He does not differentiate this from a personal attack, especially when he was very much responsible for escalating several interactions he has with others.

[–] webadict 23 points 2 months ago

Their comment history is fucking insane. They appear to support accelerationism, so they got what they wanted.

[–] webadict 1 points 2 months ago

I don't think it is (or at least it isn't fully), based on the guy's post history.

[–] webadict 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'll bet she could carry more meat than you.

[–] webadict 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Be careful what you wish for, or they will find the one woman trained in medicine who wants to sterilize people using logic derived from eugenics.

view more: ‹ prev next ›