void_wanderer

Why wouldn't it work? It's just being a legal entity that rents the servers and hosts the instance, instead of a naturla person.

I don't see any reason why it couldn't.

Was this properly announced anywhere?

Caching is creating a local copy which they host. It might be legal grey area, but IMO it's a real threat.

This has absolutely nothing to do with censorship.

Any recommendation? I don't want to accidentally sign up on some right wing instance etc.

No. In Germany we have something called gGmbH. It's basically a non-profit Limited. But IANAL, no idea if and how this would be able to protect the admins.

One link in one discussion that slips through is basically enough.

Thing is, if this takes off and websites adopt it, FF will be forced to integrate it aswell. I'd be fine with some websites not working in FF, but my mother will call me and say "the internet is broken". I guess Mozilla doesn't want and/or cannot afford that.

Trivia: I just learned two weeks ago that "firm"ware is in between "hard"ware and "soft"ware. It has nothing to do with a firm (a company).

You sure write a lot for saying so little. I suggest to step out of your bubble for once and actually talk to people. Why do you think so many people upvoted? Because everybody is brainwashed except you? Oh lord.

Also, I know who the AfD is, but thanks for the lecture. I know about their ties to Russia, their capitalist views, and that Weidl is married to a Sri Lankan woman and yet yells "Festung Europa" and hates on gays. But all these facts don't matter. People don't vote AfD for their program, they vote them for their talking points, and because of the political climate, that they party create themselves. The other parties need to adress the points that AfD uses and dismantle them. There are ways how you can critically discuss immigration, climate change politics, and economic imbalance without a right wing perpective. That's basically all I wanted to say. You misinterpreted way more in my answer then there actually was.

That graph with the gender mentions actually is really nice. But still, this doesn't matter. What matters is what the public sees and hears about them. Sure, in part it's the (social)media that fires against the left for i.e. the gender discussion, but the bigger part is that the left is totally aimless, leaderless and profileless, lost on it's track.

Sadly, the tone in your reply is really hateful and annoys me to hell, otherwise I would really like to dicuss with you.

Also, just to have it said, I fucking hate Wagenknecht.

Good riddance!

How so? Educate us!