Ah okay, we are just describing the same thing 👍 I agree, this will be our future
theunknownmuncher
joined 7 months ago
I don't think that answered my question, but maybe I just don't understand what you mean.
I could see a world where media outlets and publishers sign their published content in order to make it verifiable what the source of the content is, for a hypothetical example, AP news could sign photographs taken by a journalist, and if it is a reputable source that people trust to not be creating misinformation, then they can trust the signed content.
I don't really see a way that digital signatures can be applied to content created and posted by untrusted users in order to verify that they aren't AI generated or misinformation.
Honest question. What will stop someone from getting AI generated images digitally signed as well? Who will be the authority doing the signing?
The device in the OP is not the steam deck
Hey, physicists drink more than you might expect
Absurdly massive and yet no space for some touchpads? 🤡
Huh? Open source has a definition. It means the source is accessible and one can build the software themself. I think you might be mixing up open source and FOSS (which does have to do with licenses).
That's not what open source means
Weird, with just jShelter alone, I get "Your browser has a randomized fingerprint" on both desktop and mobile. Firefox browser
I choose to become a nuclear submarine: radiation + sub-mariner + super hearing