thepiggz

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

After some thought, my new inclination:

Whether intrinsic value exists or not is unknowable to us, specifically because we did not create our own universe. I can’t say for certain there is value in truth, justice, love, etc. beyond what we humans assign to these things. Yet, I can’t say for certain that there is not. Intrinsic value by its very nature and definition is a mystery.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Could be. Interesting tactic. Energy does indeed seem to intrinsically exist. Existence does seem to exist. Scarcity does seem to exist. Even shared feelings of value for things that are hard to make a logical case for them seem to intrinsically exist. Yet, I feel unsatisfied that intrinsic value exists. Maybe I mean something harder to define.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I like this idea of life in general defining inherent value. What if we encountered an alien race that developed completely separate from us and we happened to view certain common things as having intrinsic value? Could we make a case that these concepts of intrinsic value truly exist?

Yet, if life itself were high on that list we might be a bit bias.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Say, existence = value maybe? Or, energy = value?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

A good question. Does value exist without an entity to experience and quantify it? Is there value in a universe without humans - assuming such a universe could exist?

 

I’m new in this community. Anyone interested in engaging with these sorts of questions? If so, share your thoughts.

My initial inclination is that intrinsic value is an illusion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m a programmer. If someone had an interest they could preserve all of your self-hosted data without your permission. I think it is worth considering tho, if all of this is valuable then it would be ideal if we could get that value into the accounts of people in need rather than the alternative.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Agreed that instance admins might not be expected to handle this sort of thing.

Agreed that it is easy to get a copy of the content.

I think we might handle this best as a cumulative platform and community.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Oddly enough, my understanding is that in many jurisdictions it is a matter explicitly asserting these rights. Aside from that, requesting that they be enforced when they are violated.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Interesting take. I like the light philosophical bend there with the mental value. I think you’re right about that. I have been more considering whether the cumulative data of a platform like Lemmy as a whole is something that we as the users/server should be asserting our ownership of. Or, whether it is effectively worthless.

-5
Are Our Posts Valuable? (programming.dev)
 

This is a quick follow-up to my previous post about whether or not we own our posts. Any thoughts?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Agreed it would be trivial for Meta to obtain the posts. But I think the concern of most people here isn’t Meta obtaining the posts, it’s Meta monetizing them through ads and training. Would it not be in our best interest to try to prevent this?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Agreed. It would be nice if joke comments could continue to find a happy home in joke communities. I’m not really in it for the laughs most of the time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
67
Do we own our posts? (programming.dev)
 

Who owns what we post?

 

I like this happy looking guy. I originally thought his ears were his arms - now I just keep thinking of it that way. Like a white Kirby reaching for the stars.

Anyway, I enjoy the app very much and support what y’all are doing.

-5
OO awkward (programming.dev)
 

addEventListener accept function references rather than objects with expected methods like handleEvent

setTimeout and setInterval array map, filter, reduce, forEach, etc. promise then, catch, finally

bind awkward

closures

what say v8? hidden classes

fully init objects give me more perf tips

 

If you have a Quest or whatnot and haven’t booted it up in a while, trying this out is worth the sickness and eye strain.

view more: next ›