You can literally monitor where the data is being transmitted. There is no need to trust anyone. If it was sending data to anything that isn’t your relay server, you’d be able to easily prove it.
tekato
joined 4 months ago
I guess the fact that the last release was in April. Some people refuse to compile their apps even though it’s better.
You can self-host your own relay, what is there to worry about?
They don’t support new technologies (Wayland), why would they drop support for old ones?
Yes, looks like the actual advantage (or disadvantage , depending on who you are) is ensuring that you don’t send a false location to a third party.
Where does CUDA come into play for screen tearing?
You then execute that SNARK on your local device with your current exact GPS coordinates
No, that’s what I’m suggesting. The proposed method in the paper makes no use of GPS, instead it’s some peer-to-peer network.
You mean the hexagon? What prevents you from mapping your GPS output to a hexagon?
It is better, just not on NVIDIA GPUs.
How is this better than just mapping GPS data to a hexagon and sending that to the third-party?
HDR/Color Management is not really AMD’s job. That’s between the Wayland and Mesa guys (I guess you could say AMD belongs in the “Mesa guys” umbrella).
Also, I’m pretty sure AMD already supports ray tracing through Mesa, and is enabled by default since version 23.2 on the radv driver: