t0m5k1

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] t0m5k1 1 points 1 year ago

Just nope.

Raspberry ripple.

[โ€“] t0m5k1 6 points 1 year ago

Well done rishi, screwed us as chancellor and now following through as a pm. ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป

[โ€“] t0m5k1 6 points 1 year ago

Just one junta supplying another junta.

[โ€“] t0m5k1 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yaaaay another black market. Just what the government needs, gotta keep the black budget funded.

[โ€“] t0m5k1 3 points 1 year ago

I've not used conky since 2018.

My authy came from aur, no snap required.

[โ€“] t0m5k1 0 points 1 year ago

Yup, windows is calling you.

Bye

[โ€“] t0m5k1 -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Keep telling yourself that, meanwhile we'll all see your obvious dislike of of general userland tools.

[โ€“] t0m5k1 10 points 1 year ago

You clearly didn't read did you:

The makedeb Package Repository (abbreviated MPR) is a user-maintained repository of build files (PKGBUILDs) that can be built with makedeb and then installed with APT.

[โ€“] t0m5k1 -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Here's a handy chart for you

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems

As you can see many have the ability to start services in parallel. Some script magic with graphviz will also do similar to analyse blame.

What's wrong? Too many tools, way too fragmented and poorly integrated. It is very, very easy to get into trouble if you simply setup a dual stack system with IPv6-PD with those tools. With systemd it all works of the box with simples configuration files and its way more intuitive. For eg. cron is a mess, systemd timers share the unit config format which is way better and more scalable.

Do you honestly beloved thie mental gymnastics your getting into just to prove your point, go back to windows. Lol

Well done on using systemd how you wish, now move on and let others use it how they wish or remove it.

[โ€“] t0m5k1 76 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Why anyone would buy into this crap is beyond me.

[โ€“] t0m5k1 -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

That list of "features" never needed to be replaced by systemd and for the most part are provided by the other init offerings.

As for logging you may find yourself one with a system using systemd that has faced an error and cannot boot good luck reading the binary journal it makes, yes these entries can be pushed out to text file or syslog but if systemd falls over hard it will log to the default binary journal and you'll need to use another install with systemd to run journalctl --file /path/to/mounted/journal which in an emergency is a true PITA.

It is not an outlet for those who you choose to espouse as "People who don't want linux to evolve" far from it most of them just want systemd to stop trying to replace things that are not broken and for other projects to stop having it as a hard dependency. Yes it is modular, yes these can be disabled but it has so many tentacles that it is clear the intentions are wider than just being an init.

What's wrong with ip, iproute2, iptables/nftables, ufw, firewalld, ntp, dnscrypt, privoxy, dnsmasq, openresolve, crond, sudo, mount, syslog-ng?

Are they somehow obsolete now?

If you want a basic bootloader your UEFI has one built in and/or you can boot the kernel directly with efistub, systemd-boot is so basic it's pointless to the point that an unconfigured install of refind is a truckload better.

I get that this is a hot topic but waaay too many people are just adding pointless opinion and toxic opinion into this debate that doesn't help anyone make what they want is a decent informed choice and tbh when I see Gnome make a hard dependency of systemd it makes me think either systemd is doing too much, is not modular enough, devs got lazy or all of the above.

And a final FYI I use systemd and have disabled much of it but can't uninstall the parts I don't need/want.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ