sumofchemicals

You're right that it completely fabricates stuff. And even with that reality, it improves my productivity, because I can take multiple swings and still be faster than googling. (And sometimes might just not find an answer googling)

Of course you've got to know that's how the tool works, and some people are hyping it and acting like it's useful in all situations. And there are scenarios where I don't know enough about the subject to begin with to ask the right question or realize how incorrect the answer it's giving is.

I only commented because you said you can't get the correct answer, and that people don't check the answer, both of which I know from my and my friends actual usage is not the case.

I have seen someone type "tell me how make a million dollar business" into chatgpt. Of course that's not going to work. But LLMs have immediate obvious value that crypto does not, and I think making the comparison reveals a lack of experience with those useful applications. I'm using chatgpt nearly every day as a tool to help with coding. It's not a replacement for a person, but it is like giving a person a forklift.

This hasn't been my experience. Yes, chatgpt gets stuff wrong, and fairly regularly. But I can ask it my question directly, and can include sample code, and I get an answer immediately. Anyone going on stack overflow has to either google around and sift through answers for relevance, or has to post the question and wait for someone to respond.

With either chatgpt or stack you have to check the answer to make sure it works - that's how coding goes. But one I know if it works or not pretty much immediately with fairly low investment of time and effort. And if it doesn't, I just rephrase the question, or literally say "that doesn't seem to work, now I'm getting this error: $error"

You're right that lemmy primarily needs content, and it doesn't have to be just credentialed experts. It will grow in appeal the more there are real communities discussing whatever their subject of interest is.

Realizing we're talking about an imaginary world here, but in some cases probably appropriate not to discuss sensitive matters when you don't know who is within earshot of the communicator

I do think it's different this time, but

Some of this stuff seems real, but in the one twitter thread embedded in this article, the person says, "Remember, this is fiction."

Lol yeah. Also just because I'd like a different platform to be dominant doesn't mean I don't need to use the current one sometimes

It's not public opinion I'm necessarily concerned about, it's attacks by those who benefit from the way things are.

Also, choosing language that strengthens your position is the logical approach for anyone advocating for change. I'm not trying to obscure my position, I'm trying to make it clear.

I could see a world where people are guaranteed shelter but it's a hole in the wall and they're not allowed to be other places like restaurants, businesses etc. because they don't have the money for it.

Glad you're with us.

I think there's some legitimate concern about essentially giving prisoners a broadcast. You're right that they ought to have some minimum amount of guaranteed communication, but more in the sense that they can call their family or friends without having to pay fees.

Also would love to see solitary confinement outlawed.