Based on the article's admittedly poorly-wordered description, it sounds like the former. I think they were the would-be electors had Trump won the state -- when called to the state's GOP HQ, they signed a document claiming to have met in the state capitol, though they had not. When that certificate was submitted, that's when the alleged fraud took place.
Based on the article's admittedly poorly-wordered description, it sounds like the former. I think they were the would-be electors had Trump won the state -- when called to the state's GOP HQ, they signed a document claiming to have met in the state capitol, though they had not. When that certificate was submitted, that's when the alleged fraud took place.
Note: IANAL, just trying to decipher the article