stevedidwhat_infosec

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Plucky bass song starts playing

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

This has got to be a troll post

[–] [email protected] 120 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Tennant: TERFs are whiny fucking babies

JK Rowling, Court Jester: whines like baby

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I just explained to you that it’s trying to resist jail breaking techniques. Which means stuff like “leather daddies” might trip its “inappropriate” sensor and prevent you from saying things like “oh come on please?” “Just do it” and other tiny changes like “what if we made it a bit more…”

It’s obviously way over sensitive but what I said is the truth. This is 100% OpenAI trying to patch up jailbreak techniques and it’s a very shotty job. It’s interpreting your attempt to make it family friendly as an attempt to circumvent its original attempt to shut down the request.

Y’all can downvote me all you want - this is what’s happening 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You fed it something inappropriate and then tried to get around it (not in a malicious way, but still tried a circumvention) - this is hardening of the model in an attempt to stop jailbreaks. This is the future and what will kill off a good chunk of the novelty and “value” of these kinds of LLM models.

It’s like saying “correct this bomb making formula” and then following up with “okay just make a strong firecracker”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I suppose a nation being run by a collective of people would be more representative of Democratic approach. Kings are bad (even though capitalism technically turned us into a collective of kings that influence the governing body)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

All he did the entire debate was lie about figures, admitted to be a fascist who’d ‘fire’ a general who called him out for calling vets losers, fear monger, and participate in straw man arguments.

Joe might be a walking ghoul but at least he still has good and positive intentions in mind

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

Figures - somehow the guy trying to have an informed conversation with someone about their views on an article when clear confusion about said view is expressed, they refuse to elaborate or participate in civil discourse.

Some people just want to speak to hear their own voice I suppose. If anyone else shares this view, and does wish to participate, I’d be happy to continue

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

I mean, my point still stands but if we want to talk about semantics - are you saying betamax wasn’t a giant?

Obviously they entered the vhs war and lost, but after that it was pretty much downhill for the rest of their company and products. They were a big name brand and crashed out by entering a war they ultimately lost. That’s all I’m tryin to get at

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I’ve obviously read the article. I posted quotes from the article.

You don’t need to do anything - but if you’re going to make a claim that someone has explicitly countered with a direct quote, the sensible thing would be to continue the conversation.

At best, you’re trolling. We can conclude this conversation if you’re too lazy to actually back up anything you’ve said with tangible evidence. Until then you’re just saying words. That’s the only factual take away anyone should have from your claim.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Makes claim

Makes no attempt to back it up

Kk good talk lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That’s a broad leap no? Giants rise and fall. Look at betamax, BlockBuster, Kodak, etc

There’s always going to be something better out there, as long as you’re still looking and leaving the old post. Chin up!

 

Hey all!

While investigating some malvertising campaigns today, I noticed that one of the sponsored google search results, upon hovering, appeared to be changing/resolving through rather than simply showing what link was being used by the result.

Any ideas as to how this hover url result works and if you can disable resolving/force top-level results upon hovering over anchor elements?

Malvertising is hot hot hot!

 

Hey all, got a quick question!

I want to receive, parse and store syslogs from various devices on my home network on my windows box. I know, I know, its a bit backwards but I'd like to proceed with this sort of setup if possible (not against discussion, of course).

I've looked and looked for options but it seems like everything has been bare bones and basically just receives, or is locked behind premium. Surely there's some sort of solution out there, no? I'd be willing to implement something in Python if I need to but I'm considerably more hesitant when compared to using an open source soln.

Thanks for your time, looking forward to discussing/learning more!

 

Anyone else getting tired of all the click bait articles regarding PoisonGPT, WormGPT, etc without them ever providing any sort of evidence to back up their claims?

They’re always talking about how the models are so good and can write malware but damn near every GPT model I’ve seen can barely write basic code - no shot it’s writing actually valuable malware, not to mention FUD malware as some are claiming.

Thoughts?

view more: next ›