Is there a law for when people intentionally ignore authorial intent to invoke Poes Law unnecessarily?
spooky2092
joined 1 month ago
Needs many, many more rocks.
It is also the law here that it's the follower's responsibility to maintain proper following distance. But if they're not going to keep you safe, you slow down to make sure you're both safer with their choice in follow distance.
That just sounds like me pissing myself with extra steps.
Press [F] to pay respects the the dog who lived in a house down the street.
Does this surprise anyone? I doubt they even have concepts of a plan, because they don't give a fuck.
The crisis was that we didn't have a crisis,so he had to manufacturer one. He's totally just a job creator you guiz!!!1!
Did he do that for D4? I thought I heard he could actually play that, but he just absolutely n00bed up the PoE2 play.
We still have no word for the, uhm, "soft" gender to differentiate it from the biological gender?
Sex. The term for biological gender is 'sex'. You can be male sexed (ie assigned male at birth [AMAB]), but that doesn't make your gender male necessarily. We have plenty of words for ones gender that aren't male or female, it just scares and confuses people who don't want to think about other genders than male/female.
Because, since gender has two parts, he's right and wrong.
He's not wrong, you just seem to lack proper knowledge of the topic.
Oh don't get me wrong, I understand the point you're trying to make just fine. It's just a bad argument that falls apart if you aren't entirely privileged and give it more than a cursory, surface level look.
Find a different behavior to replace it is the easiest in my experience. But not every apology worthy behavior has an alternative or replacement.