sol87

joined 2 years ago
[–] sol87 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Actually....doing this is great for security and privacy. Especially for more sensitive logins. Use a password manager.

[–] sol87 6 points 2 years ago

At the rate things are going old.reddit doesnt have long left

[–] sol87 1 points 2 years ago

Oh noes not the marijuwanas

[–] sol87 1 points 2 years ago

Basiclly for supporting certian subreddits that promoted it. Obviously this isnt real proof but reddit at the time did not seem to have a problem with it. Anderson Cooper did a peice on it as well.

https://www.gawker.com/5842584/americas-most-prestigious-magazine-publisher-returns-to-pedophilia-bait

[–] sol87 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thats a nice thought....but Spez is a pedophile and Its way more likely hes trying to completly sell out the company

[–] sol87 2 points 2 years ago

Oof check your link, dont send people to that hell hole! They are sneaky, tricked you into thinking you posted a jpeg.

[–] sol87 3 points 2 years ago

You cant argue Stouffer

[–] sol87 4 points 2 years ago

I heard that Starbucks bought them out to shut it down

[–] sol87 2 points 2 years ago

I havent heard of Mull but perhaps the project isnt quite polished yet or is too restrictive by default for your use case.

For Android/iOS (Firefox or Chromium), you can get the Ublock Orgin addon, use as is or set to "hard" mode for the most blocking. I would highly recommend to disable cookies, use a secure seperate password manager for logins, and dont allow your browser to save anything except the sites cache for faster loading. Keep up on your Android security updates.

[–] sol87 17 points 2 years ago

The real trick is getting BACK to the baseball post

[–] sol87 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now how to get back to the basball post...

[–] sol87 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"In analyzing the availability of the immunity offered by Section 230, courts generally apply a three-prong test. A defendant must satisfy each of the three prongs to gain the benefit of the immunity:

  1. The defendant must be a "provider or user" of an "interactive computer service".
  2. The cause of action asserted by the plaintiff must treat the defendant as the "publisher or speaker" of the harmful information at issue.

3. The information must be "provided by another information content provider", i.e., the defendant must not be the "information content provider" of the harmful information at issue."

If Reddit the company is now picking and choosing who approves or blocks harmful information, are they an information content provider now? Are they liable if their chosen mods allow harmful content?

view more: ‹ prev next ›