Nope. Would 't mind if Khamenei and Netanyahu both took a .50 cal to the forehead though.
But people like you are just like a bunch of people over here. You just want to force everyone into a pigeonhole that makes you feel better about yourself and your ideology.
People are sheep and easily manipulated. That is what Netanyahu is doing, that is what Khamenei is doing, and are you manipulating or one of the manipulated?
God, what a voice.
A. I was commiserating with you.
B. Not sure where you are coming from with that weird judgment about my shallow reasoning and arrogance, lol.
C. Cheers mate. Maybe you should take a break.
Yeah, man. This crowd doesn't really care about the point you were trying to make. Lemmy just wants to vote their feelings.
Don't sweat it.
That's my guess.
Looking at how people are commenting here, they would find six ways he committed a war crime, and whine how much he destroyed their day, and what a terrible, clueless person he is, if he just said, "Good afternoon."
I'm kind of curious why the article was even written. The guy is clearly out of the public eye and hardly anyone wants to know what he thinks anyways.
Why would he invite anymore scrutiny?
Some guy on here is still commenting on his painting, lol!? That was a stupid complaint when it first came out. Now it just makes the commenter look weird.
Most schools make you buy a clear backpack, so they wouldn't be able to use these anyway.
What you said:
"the battery of the Pixel sucks balls."
I was shocked because I took you at face value and thought maybe I got lucky with mine.
Then you started talking shit about your phone working for weeks at a time and and I thought, "Who has a smartphone that works for weeks at a time without charging?"
So I looked it up. You basically have a special use phone with a battery twice the size of everyone else's. Then you get on a thread talking about Graphene OS and say, "Pixel batteries sucks balls."
Then to try and support your argument, you pull up a review that just says it "doesn't quite live up to the standard"
From the article YOU posted:
"The average result for smartphones on our test is to post a time that's just shy of 10 hours."
The Pixel 8...posted a time of 9 hours and 50 minutes on our test."
So the worse thing you can say is the Pixel's batteries are average.
So like a typical redditor, you're just shooting your bitch mouth off, half cocked, spouting bullshit, pretending you know what you're talking about.
If you were really trying to be informative, you would have said something along the lines of, "There are phones that are designed to have much longer battery life. But oh yeah, almost every other feature will be worse."
But you said, "PIXEL BATTERIES SUCK BALLS", and then provide a review that places them right at the average.
You started this conversation. Think about that next time you want to post something stupid
Man, if my work would let me purchase my travel on it too, instead of the company card... I'd be Global Services for sure.
For the record, I looked it up. The pixel falls in line with most other mainstream phones. Depending on the model it can be in the lower half, sometimes upper half, but always top ten.
Your phone seems to be specifically designed for ruggedness and battery life.
In fact of all the reviews I can find, about your phone they essentially say: it works ok as a phone but hey, I can throw it against a wall and it has awesome battery life.
So calling out the Pixel specifically and using the Oukitel as a metric is just straight up fuckery.
That's the kind of crap that needs to be left on Reddit. Go back there to post your gatekeeping bullshit.
I disagree. I think that claiming something "sucks balls" because it will only last two days of normal use before dying, if you don't charge it all all, is absolutely ludicrous.
If I just text and leave my screen dim, I could get a whole week out of my phone. But that's not why I got a smart phone. I got a smart phone so I could use it, not see how long I could get the battery to last.
There is no what about female circumcision. There is nothing controversial about it. It IS mutilation.
Do we need to make an amendment that bans arbitration clauses?
I don't see how a click, to use a service, can subsume a constitutional right.