Do you mind? We're trying to have a circlejerk here.
sab
joined 2 years ago
I'm sorry you felt the need to denounce claims in videos while openly admitting you don't even know what the claims are.
I doubt either one of you will ever hear from them. I guess they haven't even watched the video to begin with.
I didn't know those were LLMs, TIL.
You're missing the point. I'll make your example more specific.
Well when fraud/rape/murder happens we have laws. So no problems.
Those things happen. Creating a LLM based on copyrighted material without permission happens - it's not a hypothetical. But even then, giving a punishment after the fact does not make the initial crime "no problem", as you put it.
I don't think anyone is faulting the machines for this, just the people who instruct the machines to do it.
Would you be okay with applying that argument for any crime?
Using it to (create a tool to) create derivatives of the work on a massive scale.
Maybe make your point yourself, instead of asking people to Google it for you?
Does that refer to Izzy, or the people who complained because they expressed their opinion?
You keep saying that, but never back it up with any reason.
Everyone here agrees the data is incomplete, but that it's the best data we have. Only you keep implying that it's incorrect because [ever less verifiable, unspecified reasons]. Holy hypocrisy, batman.