rwhitisissle

joined 1 year ago
[–] rwhitisissle 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

2015

A classic.

[–] rwhitisissle 1 points 5 months ago

only on new reddit

It's also blocked for old.reddit.com.

[–] rwhitisissle 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You know, for all the complaints I see of tankies, I have encountered 10x more people who incessantly complain about them.

[–] rwhitisissle 126 points 5 months ago (15 children)

How do you feel about Linux and leftist infighting?

[–] rwhitisissle 9 points 5 months ago

And both of those things SUUUUUCK.

[–] rwhitisissle 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Probably more likely the name is a reference to Civil War Confederate General Basil Duke. Or perhaps the name merely is meant to invoke the idea of the Dukes as important, "noble" figures in Hazzard County, or at least more noble than the corrupt Boss Hogg. Or maybe a cigar is just a cigar in this case.

[–] rwhitisissle 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Starring the legendary James Mitchum! Probably because Mitchum also starred in Thunder Road, which is the grandaddy of all "bootleggers in a fast car" movies, and which was originally written with Elvis Presley in mind for the lead role.

[–] rwhitisissle 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This comment should be automatically linked to anyone on this platform saying the average Lemmy poster is smarter or less sheepish in their behavior than the average reddit poster. People are legit downvoting you for being right and having sources to back up your argument.

[–] rwhitisissle 13 points 5 months ago

Wow, my opinion of this intentionally abrasive and combative, potentially mentally ill homeless man who was well known for public urination, defecation, and masturbation, and who lived in a society 2400 years divorced from my own, whose understanding of gender and sex that was, as is the case for literally all of us, a product of his environment and upbringing, has never been lower.

[–] rwhitisissle 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

surprised to find indignation at sexual scenes in novels

To quote Ryan Letourneau, "Gen Z is Puritanpilled." Seriously, I've found post-millennial generations to be extremely prudish. I think part of it has to do with the fact that as the internet evolved and became mainstream (and more profitable by catering to general audiences), the edgy or adult content became more ghetoized and quarantined over time. Used to be you'd go to reddit and there'd be porn on the front page. There's like a 0% change of finding something NSFW on the front page there now. As such, younger people who grew up with the modern incarnation of the internet have a very different perspective on sexual content than those of us who grew up with a more "wild west" style internet where porn was just something that lived alongside the more mundane content. The side-effect of this is also that content like the John Irving novels you're talking about are treated as if they're grotesque for presenting sex as just another part of people's lives - something that you're not supposed to be shy about or ashamed of. Which is, uh...concerning, for a number of reasons. Other theories are that the world in which we live has eroded platonic relationships among young people and that they want to only see platonic friendships among characters, as that's the vicarious experience they most desire.

[–] rwhitisissle 4 points 5 months ago

It's episode 2. "Fifteen Million Merits."

[–] rwhitisissle 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How much easier is it for Google to implement the same?

The correct question is actually "when will Google implement the same?" Because this is a "when will it happen" question, not a "will it happen" question.

view more: ‹ prev next ›